Steinmeyer E M, Klosterkötter J, Möller H J, Sass H, Herpertz S, Czernik A, Marcea J T, Matakas F, Mehne J, Bottländer H, Hesse W, Steinbring I, Pukrop R
Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Universität zu Köln.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2002 Dec;70(12):641-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35854.
The 'Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology - Basic Questionnaire' (DAPP) measures 18 traits to provide a systematic representation of the overall domain of personality disorders (PD). The present study investigated the relationships between DAPP personality profiles and dimensional assessments of DSM-IV PD in general population subjects (n = 156), and a sample of 220 nonpsychotic psychiatric patients (including n = 67 PD patients). Using nonmetric multidimensional scaling models the similarities between the 18 DAPP-factors and the dimensional scores of the 12 DSM-IV PD (inclusive appendix) were graphically represented in a 2-dimensional similarity-system. Here each DSM-IV PD dimension could be described by a distinct profile of DAPP-factors. Overall results support the assumption that PD can be represented by a dimensional system of personality traits with sufficient sensitivity and specificity.
“人格病理学维度评估 - 基础问卷”（DAPP）测量18种特质，以系统呈现人格障碍（PD）的整体领域。本研究调查了普通人群受试者（n = 156）以及220名非精神病性精神科患者样本（包括67名PD患者）中DAPP人格概况与DSM-IV人格障碍维度评估之间的关系。使用非度量多维标度模型，18个DAPP因子与12种DSM-IV人格障碍（包括附录）的维度得分之间的相似性在二维相似性系统中以图形方式呈现。在此，每个DSM-IV人格障碍维度都可以通过DAPP因子的独特概况来描述。总体结果支持以下假设，即人格障碍可以由具有足够敏感性和特异性的人格特质维度系统来表示。
