• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[心理健康服务研究中的随机对照试验:实施中的实际问题]

[Randomised controlled trials in mental health services research: practical problems of implementation].

作者信息

Kallert T W, Schützwohl M

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden.

出版信息

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2002 Dec;70(12):647-56. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35856.

DOI:10.1055/s-2002-35856
PMID:12459946
Abstract

This article outlines problems of implementation and clinical practice of randomised controlled trials in mental health services. Furthermore, it offers practical solutions taking into account the experiences with a randomisation process in a multi-site EC-funded (EDEN-) study on the evaluation of acute treatment in psychiatric day hospitals. Identification of the problems follows the time-course of a research project: 1. Problems to be solved prior to the study's commencement: Definition of the eligibility criteria, information of clinically working colleagues. 2. Problems referring to the process of randomisation: Influence of clinical experience of the research fellows, precise time-point of implementing the randomisation into the process of admission, assessment of the patient's ability to give informed consent, patient's refusal of randomisation but agreement to study participation, availability of treatment places. 3. Problems which might occur after randomisation: Early break-off of treatment, transfer from one treatment setting to another. General conclusion: Detailed definitions of the randomisation procedure do not guarantee high performance quality and randomisation rates. Continuous precise assessment of the implementation into the clinical routines of every study centre, adaptation according to specific conditions and personal discussions with all participants are obligatory to establish and maintain a high quality of this important research procedure.

摘要

本文概述了精神卫生服务中随机对照试验的实施问题和临床实践。此外,结合一项由欧盟资助的多中心(EDEN-)研究中关于精神病日间医院急性治疗评估的随机化过程经验,提供了切实可行的解决方案。问题的识别遵循研究项目的时间进程:1. 研究开始前需解决的问题:确定纳入标准,告知临床工作的同事。2. 与随机化过程相关的问题:研究员临床经验的影响,在入院过程中实施随机化的精确时间点,评估患者给予知情同意的能力,患者拒绝随机化但同意参与研究,治疗场所的可用性。3. 随机化后可能出现的问题:治疗提前中断,从一种治疗环境转至另一种治疗环境。总体结论:随机化程序的详细定义并不能保证高性能质量和随机化率。对每个研究中心临床常规实施情况进行持续精确评估,根据具体情况进行调整,并与所有参与者进行个人讨论,对于建立和维持这一重要研究程序的高质量至关重要。

相似文献

1
[Randomised controlled trials in mental health services research: practical problems of implementation].[心理健康服务研究中的随机对照试验:实施中的实际问题]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2002 Dec;70(12):647-56. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35856.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[Pre-randomisation in study designs: getting past the taboo].[研究设计中的随机化前处理:突破禁忌]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Sep 20;152(38):2053-6.
4
[The request for consent in clinical research: a randomized study in healthy subjects].[临床研究中的同意请求:一项针对健康受试者的随机研究]
Epidemiol Prev. 1995 Sep;19(64):282-90.
5
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
6
Experiences in the realisation of a research project on anthroposophical medicine in patients with advanced cancer.关于对晚期癌症患者进行人智医学研究项目的实施经验。
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 2000 Aug 26;130(34):1173-84.
7
Long term clinical trials: how much information do participants retain from the informed consent process?长期临床试验:参与者从知情同意过程中记住了多少信息?
Contemp Clin Trials. 2006 Oct;27(5):441-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.006. Epub 2006 May 12.
8
['Informed consent' and prerandomization].知情同意与随机分组前
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Jul 1;144(27):1301-3.
9
Design of trials with dying patients: a feasibility study of cluster randomisation versus randomised consent.针对临终患者的试验设计:整群随机化与随机同意的可行性研究
Palliat Med. 2006 Dec;20(8):799-804. doi: 10.1177/0269216306072554.
10
Conducting randomized trials in general practice: methodological and practical issues.在全科医疗中开展随机试验:方法学与实际问题
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Nov;49(448):919-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Network coordination following discharge from psychiatric inpatient treatment: a study protocol.精神科住院治疗后出院的网络协调:一项研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Sep 4;13:220. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-220.