• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[临床研究中的同意请求:一项针对健康受试者的随机研究]

[The request for consent in clinical research: a randomized study in healthy subjects].

作者信息

Perrone F, De Placido S, Giusti C, Gallo C

机构信息

Centro Elaborazione Dati Clinici del Mezzogiorno, CNR-ACRO.

出版信息

Epidemiol Prev. 1995 Sep;19(64):282-90.

PMID:7498356
Abstract

To compare two strategies of consent requirement (classical informed consent and randomised consent according to Zelen), the Clinical Data Elaboration Centre of South Italy, within the special project Clinical Application of Oncological Research of the National Research Council of Italy (CNR-ACRO) invited healthy people visiting the 7th edition of the scientific exhibition "Futuro Remoto" to simulate of being ill and receiving the offer of entering a clinical trial. Within informed consent strategy patients are asked to agree to the randomisation process, while, in the randomised consent, randomised treatment assignment is performed before consent requirement and patients should agree directly to the assigned therapy. Major aims of the study were (a) to compare the strategies in terms of refusal rate to a hypothetical clinical trial, and (b) to estimate whether severity of prognosis affected subjects' decision. 3,217 visiting people participated to the simulation; they were prevalently young, males and with a high level of school education. The study was performed in two different scenarios. In the first one, with one choice option, subject refusing consent could receive standard therapy only; refusal rate was 16% after informed consent and 13.4% after randomised consent (for experimental therapy). In the other scenario, with two choice options, subjects refusing consent could choose the preferred therapy; refusal rate was 20.6% after informed consent, 48.1% after randomised consent (for standard therapy) and 13.4% after randomised consent (for experimental therapy).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为比较两种同意要求策略(传统知情同意和根据泽伦方法的随机同意),意大利南部临床数据处理中心在意大利国家研究委员会(CNR-ACRO)的肿瘤研究临床应用特别项目中,邀请参观第七届“遥远未来”科学展览的健康人模拟患病并接受参与一项临床试验的邀请。在知情同意策略中,要求患者同意随机分组过程,而在随机同意中,随机治疗分配在同意要求之前进行,患者应直接同意分配的治疗方案。该研究的主要目的是:(a)比较两种策略在对假设临床试验的拒绝率方面的差异;(b)评估预后严重程度是否影响受试者的决定。3217名参观者参与了模拟;他们大多为年轻人、男性且受教育程度高。该研究在两种不同场景下进行。在第一种场景中,只有一个选择选项,拒绝同意的受试者只能接受标准治疗;知情同意后的拒绝率为16%,随机同意(针对实验性治疗)后的拒绝率为13.4%。在另一种场景中,有两个选择选项,拒绝同意的受试者可以选择首选治疗;知情同意后的拒绝率为20.6%,随机同意(针对标准治疗)后的拒绝率为48.1%,随机同意(针对实验性治疗)后的拒绝率为13.4%。(摘要截选至250字)

相似文献

1
[The request for consent in clinical research: a randomized study in healthy subjects].[临床研究中的同意请求:一项针对健康受试者的随机研究]
Epidemiol Prev. 1995 Sep;19(64):282-90.
2
How preliminary data affect people's stated willingness to enter a hypothetical randomized controlled trial.初步数据如何影响人们表示愿意参与一项假设性随机对照试验的意愿。
J Investig Med. 1997 Dec;45(9):561-6.
3
Informed versus randomised consent to clinical trials.临床试验中的知情同意与随机同意
Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1060-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91741-1.
4
[Pre-randomisation in study designs: getting past the taboo].[研究设计中的随机化前处理:突破禁忌]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Sep 20;152(38):2053-6.
5
['Informed consent' and prerandomization].知情同意与随机分组前
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Jul 1;144(27):1301-3.
6
I don't like that, it's tricking people too much...: acute informed consent to participation in a trial of thrombolysis for stroke.我不喜欢那样,它太会欺骗人了……:急性中风溶栓治疗试验的知情同意
J Med Ethics. 2008 Oct;34(10):751-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023168.
7
Testing an alternate informed consent process.测试一种替代的知情同意程序。
Nurs Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;58(2):135-9. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c3df5.
8
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
9
Recruitment of subjects for clinical trials after informed consent: does gender and educational status make a difference?在获得知情同意后招募临床试验受试者:性别和教育程度会产生影响吗?
J Postgrad Med. 2003 Apr-Jun;49(2):109-13.
10
Design of trials with dying patients: a feasibility study of cluster randomisation versus randomised consent.针对临终患者的试验设计:整群随机化与随机同意的可行性研究
Palliat Med. 2006 Dec;20(8):799-804. doi: 10.1177/0269216306072554.

引用本文的文献

1
Describing the content of trial recruitment interventions using the TIDieR reporting checklist: a systematic methodology review.使用 TIDieR 报告清单描述试验招募干预措施的内容:系统方法学综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02195-5.
2
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.提高随机试验招募率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 22;2(2):MR000013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6.
3
Methodological survey of designed uneven randomization trials (DU-RANDOM): a protocol.
设计不均衡随机对照试验(DU-RANDOM)的方法学调查:一项方案
Trials. 2014 Jan 23;15:33. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-33.
4
Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.提高随机对照试验招募效果的方法:Cochrane 系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2013 Feb 7;3(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002360. Print 2013.