Mandlawitz Myrna R
MRM Associates, Washington, DC, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2002 Oct;32(5):495-508. doi: 10.1023/a:1020502324718.
Since 1990, State Educational Agency (SEA) and Local Educational Agency (LEA) policies and practices of educational programming for young children with autism have evolved in response to the due process system and court decisions. This has become an issue because of an increase in the identification of children with autism, reclassification of children previously reported under other disability categories, publicity about the competition between methodologies, parent advocacy for specific methodologies, shortages of qualified personnel, and the demand for due process to ensure appropriate services. A review is made of substantive and procedural issues presented in due process and court cases, the legal standards used by hearing officers and judges, and a synthesis of the case law. It is recommended that school districts consider legal standards as programs are designed, that programs fit the unique needs of the child, that programs ensure appropriate progress educationally and socially, and that communication between parents and school districts be open and honest so that the due process system is used as the last resort.
自1990年以来,州教育机构(SEA)和地方教育机构(LEA)针对患有自闭症的幼儿的教育规划政策及实践,已根据正当程序制度和法院判决而不断演变。由于自闭症儿童识别数量的增加、先前被归为其他残疾类别的儿童的重新分类、关于不同方法之间竞争的宣传、家长对特定方法的倡导、合格人员的短缺以及确保提供适当服务的正当程序需求,这已成为一个问题。本文对正当程序和法庭案件中出现的实体和程序问题、听证官员和法官所采用的法律标准以及判例法进行了综述。建议学区在设计项目时考虑法律标准,项目要符合儿童的独特需求,确保在教育和社交方面取得适当进展,并且家长与学区之间的沟通要开放和坦诚,以便将正当程序制度作为最后手段。