Downs Stephen M, Uner Hasmet
Children's Health Services, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:215-9.
Computer-based prompting and reminder systems have been shown to be highly effective in increasing rates of preventive services delivery. However, there are many more recommended preventive services than can be practically included in a typical clinic visit. Therefore prioritization of preventive services prompts is necessary. We describe two approaches to prioritizing preventive services prompts based on expected value decision making. One method involves a static, global prioritization across all preventive services and has been used in a production system for almost 7 years. The second method uses influence diagrams to prioritize prompts dynamically, based on individual patient data. The latter approach is still under development. Both methods are labor intensive and require a combination of epidemiologic data and expert judgment. Compromises in strictly normative process were necessary to achieve user satisfaction.
基于计算机的提示和提醒系统已被证明在提高预防性服务的提供率方面非常有效。然而,推荐的预防性服务比在一次典型的门诊中实际能够涵盖的要多得多。因此,对预防性服务提示进行优先级排序是必要的。我们描述了两种基于期望值决策来对预防性服务提示进行优先级排序的方法。一种方法涉及对所有预防性服务进行静态的全局优先级排序,并且已经在一个生产系统中使用了近7年。第二种方法使用影响图,根据个体患者数据动态地对提示进行优先级排序。后一种方法仍在开发中。这两种方法都需要大量人力,并且需要结合流行病学数据和专家判断。为了实现用户满意度,在严格规范的过程中做出妥协是必要的。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2002
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013-7-25
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999-1-10
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995-12
Int J Med Inform. 2018-2-2
Front Pediatr. 2017-10-3
Artif Intell Med. 2015-10-1
Appl Clin Inform. 2015-7-15
Appl Clin Inform. 2015-1-7
Pediatrics. 1997-5
Mayo Clin Proc. 1993-8