• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外培养的与野生型马氏帕金虫的比较。II. 给药方法与宿主反应。

Comparison of in vitro-cultured and wild-type Perkinsus marinus. II. Dosing methods and host response.

作者信息

Chintala Marnita M, Bushek David, Ford Susan E

出版信息

Dis Aquat Organ. 2002 Oct 4;51(3):203-16. doi: 10.3354/dao051203.

DOI:10.3354/dao051203
PMID:12465878
Abstract

Endoparasites must breach host barriers to establish infection and then must survive host internal defenses to cause disease. Such barriers may frustrate attempts to experimentally transmit parasites by 'natural' methods. In addition, the host's condition may affect a study's outcome. The experiments reported here examined the effect of dosing method and host metabolic condition on measures of virulence for the oyster parasite Perkinsus marinus. Oysters, Crassostrea virginica, were challenged with wild-type and cultured forms of P. marinus via feeding, shell-cavity injection, gut intubation and adductor-muscle injection. For both parasite types, adductor-muscle injections produced the heaviest infections followed by shell-cavity injection, gut intubation, and feeding. There was no difference in parasite burdens between oysters fed cultured cells by acute vs chronic dosing, and parasite loads stabilized over time, suggesting a dynamic equilibrium between invasion and elimination. P. marinus distribution among tissues of challenged oysters indicated that parasites invaded the mantle and gill, as well as the gut, which has been considered the primary portal of entry. Frequency distributions of P. marinus in oysters challenged with 3 different culture phases indicated an aggregated distribution among hosts and suggested that stationary-phase parasites were easiest for the oyster to control or eliminate and log-phase parasites were the most difficult. Host metabolic condition also affected experimental outcomes, as indicated by increased infection levels in oysters undergoing spawning and/or exposed to low oxygen stress.

摘要

体内寄生虫必须突破宿主屏障才能建立感染,然后必须在宿主的内部防御中存活下来才能引发疾病。这些屏障可能会阻碍通过“自然”方法进行寄生虫实验性传播的尝试。此外,宿主的状况可能会影响研究结果。本文报道的实验研究了给药方法和宿主代谢状况对牡蛎寄生虫——马氏帕金虫毒力指标的影响。通过喂食、壳腔注射、肠道插管和闭壳肌注射,用野生型和培养型马氏帕金虫对弗吉尼亚牡蛎进行攻毒。对于这两种寄生虫类型,闭壳肌注射导致的感染最严重,其次是壳腔注射、肠道插管和喂食。通过急性给药与慢性给药方式给牡蛎投喂培养细胞,寄生虫负荷没有差异,并且寄生虫载量随时间稳定下来,这表明在入侵和清除之间存在动态平衡。马氏帕金虫在受攻毒牡蛎组织中的分布表明,寄生虫侵入了外套膜、鳃以及肠道,而肠道一直被认为是主要的入侵门户。用3个不同培养阶段的马氏帕金虫攻毒牡蛎,其在牡蛎中的频率分布表明在宿主间呈聚集分布,这表明稳定期的寄生虫最容易被牡蛎控制或清除,而对数期的寄生虫最难被控制或清除。宿主代谢状况也影响实验结果,正在产卵和/或暴露于低氧应激的牡蛎感染水平增加就表明了这一点。

相似文献

1
Comparison of in vitro-cultured and wild-type Perkinsus marinus. II. Dosing methods and host response.体外培养的与野生型马氏帕金虫的比较。II. 给药方法与宿主反应。
Dis Aquat Organ. 2002 Oct 4;51(3):203-16. doi: 10.3354/dao051203.
2
Comparison of in vitro-cultured and wild-type Perkinsus marinus. III. Fecal elimination and its role in transmission.体外培养的与野生型的海派金藻的比较。III. 粪便排出及其在传播中的作用。
Dis Aquat Organ. 2002 Oct 4;51(3):217-25. doi: 10.3354/dao051217.
3
Comparison of in vitro-cultured and wild-type Perkinsus marinus. I. Pathogen virulence.体外培养的与野生型马氏帕金虫的比较。I. 病原体毒力。
Dis Aquat Organ. 2002 Oct 4;51(3):187-201. doi: 10.3354/dao051187.
4
In vivo dynamics of the microparasite Perkinsus marinus during progression and regression of infections in eastern oysters.微小寄生虫马氏帕金虫在东部牡蛎感染进程和消退过程中的体内动态变化。
J Parasitol. 1999 Apr;85(2):273-82.
5
Early host-pathogen interactions in marine bivalves: evidence that the alveolate parasite Perkinsus marinus infects through the oyster mantle during rejection of pseudofeces.海洋双壳贝类早期的宿主-病原体相互作用:表明类菌形体寄生虫 Perkinsus marinus 是在牡蛎排假粪时通过牡蛎套膜感染的证据。
J Invertebr Pathol. 2013 May;113(1):26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2012.12.011. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
6
Protease activity in the plasma of American oysters, Crassostrea virginica, experimentally infected with the protozoan parasite Perkinsus marinus.对美国牡蛎(Crassostrea virginica)进行实验性感染原生动物寄生虫马氏帕金虫(Perkinsus marinus)后,其血浆中的蛋白酶活性。
J Parasitol. 2003 Oct;89(5):941-51. doi: 10.1645/GE-3126.
7
Systematic evaluation of factors controlling Perkinsus marinus transmission dynamics in lower Chesapeake Bay.切萨皮克湾下游海氏派金虫传播动态控制因素的系统评估
Dis Aquat Organ. 2003 Aug 15;56(1):75-86. doi: 10.3354/dao056075.
8
Perkinsus marinus in pleasure oyster Crassostrea corteziensis from Nayarit, Pacific coast of México.来自墨西哥太平洋海岸纳亚里特的养殖牡蛎Crassostrea corteziensis中的马里努斯派金虫。
J Invertebr Pathol. 2008 Sep;99(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2008.03.005. Epub 2008 Mar 15.
9
Experimental cross-infections by Perkinsus marinus and P. chesapeaki in three sympatric species of Chesapeake Bay oysters and clams.由马里努斯派金虫和切萨皮克派金虫对切萨皮克湾三种同域分布的牡蛎和蛤蜊进行的实验性交叉感染。
Dis Aquat Organ. 2007 Jun 7;76(1):67-75. doi: 10.3354/dao076067.
10
Molecular epizootiology of Perkinsus marinus and P. chesapeaki infections among wild oysters and clams in Chesapeake Bay, USA.美国切萨皮克湾野生牡蛎和蛤蜊中马里努斯派金虫及切萨皮克派金虫感染的分子动物流行病学
Dis Aquat Organ. 2008 Dec 22;82(3):237-48. doi: 10.3354/dao01997.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging Parasitic Protists: The Case of Perkinsea.新兴的寄生原生生物:以 Perkinsela 为例。 (注:原文中的“Perkinsea”可能有误,推测正确的是“Perkinsela”,但按照要求未作修改直接翻译)
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jan 13;12:735815. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.735815. eCollection 2021.
2
Transcriptomic Response to in Two Oysters Reveals Evolutionary Dynamics of Host-Parasite Interactions.两种牡蛎对寄生虫的转录组反应揭示了宿主 - 寄生虫相互作用的进化动态。 (注:原文中“in Two Oysters”表述不完整,推测可能是“in Two Species of Oysters”之类,这里按完整合理意思翻译)
Front Genet. 2021 Dec 3;12:795706. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.795706. eCollection 2021.
3
Protozoan parasites of bivalve molluscs: literature follows culture.
双壳贝类的原生动物寄生虫:文献随养殖发展。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 23;9(6):e100872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100872. eCollection 2014.
4
Supplementation of Perkinsus marinus cultures with host plasma or tissue homogenate enhances their infectivity.用宿主血浆或组织匀浆补充海产派琴虫培养物可增强其感染力。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jan;70(1):421-31. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.1.421-431.2004.