Hunter Sandra K, Ryan Daphne L, Ortega Justus D, Enoka Roger M
Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0354, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Dec;88(6):3087-96. doi: 10.1152/jn.00232.2002.
Endurance time, muscle activation, and mean arterial pressure were measured during two types of submaximal fatiguing contractions that required each subject to exert the same net muscle torque in the two tasks. Sixteen men and women performed isometric contractions at 15% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) force with the elbow flexor muscles, either by maintaining a constant force while pushing against a force transducer (force task) or by supporting an equivalent inertial load while maintaining a constant elbow angle (position task). The endurance time for the force task (1402 +/- 728 s) was twice as long as that for the position task (702 +/- 582 s, P < 0.05), despite a similar reduction in the load torque at exhaustion for each contraction. The rate of increase in average electromyographic activity (EMG, % peak MVC value) for the elbow flexor muscles was similar for the two tasks. However, the average EMG was greater at exhaustion for the force task (22.4 +/- 1.2%) compared with the position task (14.9 +/- 1.0%, P < 0.05). In contrast, the rates of increase in the mean arterial pressure, the rating of perceived exertion, anterior deltoid EMG, and fluctuations in motor output (force or acceleration) were greater for the position task compared with the force task (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the rate of bursts in EMG activity, which corresponded to the transient recruitment of motor units, was greater for the brachialis muscle during the position task. These results indicate that the briefer endurance time for the position task was associated with greater levels of excitatory and inhibitory input to the motor neurons compared with the force task.
在两种次最大疲劳收缩过程中测量了耐力时间、肌肉激活情况和平均动脉压,这两种收缩要求每个受试者在两项任务中施加相同的净肌肉扭矩。16名男性和女性用肘部屈肌以最大自主收缩(MVC)力的15%进行等长收缩,要么在推压力传感器时保持恒定力(力任务),要么在保持肘部角度恒定时支撑等效惯性负荷(位置任务)。尽管每次收缩在疲劳时的负荷扭矩下降相似,但力任务的耐力时间(1402±728秒)是位置任务(702±582秒,P<0.05)的两倍。两项任务中肘部屈肌平均肌电图活动(EMG,%峰值MVC值)的增加速率相似。然而,力任务在疲劳时的平均EMG(22.4±1.2%)高于位置任务(14.9±1.0%,P<0.05)。相比之下,位置任务的平均动脉压、主观用力感觉评分、前三角肌EMG以及运动输出(力或加速度)波动的增加速率高于力任务(P<0.05)。此外,在位置任务期间,肱肌的EMG活动爆发速率(对应于运动单位的瞬时募集)更高。这些结果表明,与力任务相比,位置任务较短的耐力时间与运动神经元更高水平的兴奋性和抑制性输入有关。