Schaefer Laura V, Bittmann Frank N
Devision of Regulative Physiology and Prevention, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Brain Sci. 2022 May 29;12(6):703. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060703.
Inter-brain synchronization is primarily investigated during social interactions but had not been examined during coupled muscle action between two persons until now. It was previously shown that mechanical muscle oscillations can develop coherent behavior between two isometrically interacting persons. This case study investigated if inter-brain synchronization appears thereby, and if differences of inter- and intrapersonal muscle and brain coherence exist regarding two different types of isometric muscle action. Electroencephalography (EEG) and mechanomyography/mechanotendography (MMG/MTG) of right elbow extensors were recorded during six fatiguing trials of two coupled isometrically interacting participants (70% MVIC). One partner performed holding and one pushing isometric muscle action (HIMA/PIMA; tasks changed). The wavelet coherence of all signals (EEG, MMG/MTG, force, ACC) were analyzed intra- and interpersonally. The five longest coherence patches in 8−15 Hz and their weighted frequency were compared between real vs. random pairs and between HIMA vs. PIMA. Real vs. random pairs showed significantly higher coherence for intra-muscle, intra-brain, and inter-muscle-brain activity (p < 0.001 to 0.019). Inter-brain coherence was significantly higher for real vs. random pairs for EEG of right and central areas and for sub-regions of EEG left (p = 0.002 to 0.025). Interpersonal muscle-brain synchronization was significantly higher than intrapersonal one, whereby it was significantly higher for HIMA vs. PIMA. These preliminary findings indicate that inter-brain synchronization can arise during muscular interaction. It is hypothesized both partners merge into one oscillating neuromuscular system. The results reinforce the hypothesis that HIMA is characterized by more complex control strategies than PIMA. The pilot study suggests investigating the topic further to verify these results on a larger sample size. Findings could contribute to the basic understanding of motor control and is relevant for functional diagnostics such as the manual muscle test which is applied in several disciplines, e.g., neurology, physiotherapy.
脑间同步主要在社交互动过程中进行研究,但迄今为止尚未在两人之间的耦合肌肉动作过程中进行过检测。先前的研究表明,机械性肌肉振荡可在两个等长相互作用的人之间产生连贯行为。本案例研究调查了脑间同步是否由此出现,以及就两种不同类型的等长肌肉动作而言,人际间和人际内肌肉与脑连贯性是否存在差异。在两名等长相互作用的参与者(70% 最大随意等长收缩)进行的六次疲劳试验中,记录了右肘伸肌的脑电图(EEG)和肌动图/肌腱图(MMG/MTG)。一名参与者进行保持等长肌肉动作,另一名进行推等长肌肉动作(HIMA/PIMA;任务交替)。对所有信号(EEG、MMG/MTG、力、加速度)的小波相干性进行了人际内和人际间分析。比较了真实对与随机对之间以及 HIMA 与 PIMA 之间在 8 - 15 Hz 范围内的五个最长相干片段及其加权频率。真实对与随机对相比,肌肉内、脑内以及肌肉 - 脑间活动的相干性显著更高(p < 0.001 至 0.019)。对于右侧和中央区域的 EEG 以及左侧 EEG 的子区域,真实对与随机对相比,脑间相干性显著更高(p = 0.002 至 0.025)。人际间肌肉 - 脑同步显著高于人际内同步,其中 HIMA 与 PIMA 相比显著更高。这些初步发现表明,脑间同步可在肌肉相互作用过程中出现。据推测,双方会合并为一个振荡的神经肌肉系统。结果强化了这样的假设,即 HIMA 的特征在于比 PIMA 更复杂的控制策略。该初步研究建议进一步研究该主题,以在更大样本量上验证这些结果。研究结果可能有助于对运动控制的基本理解,并且与诸如手动肌力测试等功能诊断相关,手动肌力测试应用于多个学科,例如神经学、物理治疗。