Puc Matthew M, Tran Hoang S, Wry Philip W, Ross Steven E
Department of Surgery, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden 08103, USA.
Am Surg. 2002 Jan;68(1):65-9.
Acute acalculous cholecystitis remains a diagnostic challenge in critically ill trauma patients. Laboratory studies are nonspecific and associated injuries or mental status changes may mask clinical signs and symptoms. We conducted a retrospective study to assess the utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute acalculous cholecystitis. We hypothesized that ultrasound is inadequate as a screening tool for acute acalculous cholecystitis. The abdominal ultrasounds of all patients undergoing evaluation for acute acalculous cholecystitis in a 40-month period at our Level I trauma center were reviewed. Thickened gallbladder wall, pericholecystic fluid and emphysematous gallbladder were considered positive sonographic criteria. Sludge, cholelithiasis, and hydrops were considered suggestive. Patients who did not undergo cholecystectomy had their gallbladders evaluated either during subsequent laparotomy or at autopsy or they were discharged from the hospital without need for intervention. Sixty-two patients were included. Twenty-one patients underwent cholecystectomy for presumed acute acalculous cholecystitis. The data revealed a sensitivity of 30 per cent (6/20) and a specificity of 93 per cent (39/42) for ultrasound evaluation. Twenty patients had subsequent hepatobiliary scans [hepato-iminodiacetic acid (HIDA)] with a sensitivity of 100 per cent (12/12) and specificity of 88 per cent (7/8). Our data do not support ultrasound as a reliable routine screening tool for acute acalculous cholecystitis. Despite its convenience as a bedside procedure ultrasound has insufficient sensitivity to justify its use and a more sensitive diagnostic tool should be used.
急性非结石性胆囊炎对于重症创伤患者而言仍是一个诊断难题。实验室检查缺乏特异性,且合并伤或精神状态改变可能掩盖临床体征和症状。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估超声在急性非结石性胆囊炎诊断中的效用。我们假设超声作为急性非结石性胆囊炎的筛查工具并不充分。我们回顾了在我们的一级创伤中心40个月期间所有接受急性非结石性胆囊炎评估患者的腹部超声检查结果。胆囊壁增厚、胆囊周围积液和胆囊积气被视为超声检查阳性标准。胆囊内沉积物、胆结石和胆囊积水被视为提示性表现。未接受胆囊切除术的患者在随后的剖腹手术或尸检时对其胆囊进行评估,或者他们无需干预即可出院。纳入了62例患者。21例患者因疑似急性非结石性胆囊炎接受了胆囊切除术。数据显示超声评估的敏感性为30%(6/20),特异性为93%(39/42)。20例患者随后进行了肝胆扫描[肝亚氨基二乙酸(HIDA)],敏感性为100%(12/12),特异性为88%(7/8)。我们的数据不支持将超声作为急性非结石性胆囊炎可靠的常规筛查工具。尽管超声作为床旁检查很方便,但其敏感性不足,无法证明其使用的合理性,应使用更敏感的诊断工具。