Can sex selection be ethically tolerated?
作者信息
Dickens B M
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 2002 Dec;28(6):335-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.6.335.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Can sex selection be ethically tolerated?性别选择在伦理上能被容忍吗？
J Med Ethics. 2002 Dec;28(6):335-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.6.335.
2
Sexual dimorphism and the value of feminist bioethics.性别差异与女性主义生物伦理学的价值。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jul;10(7):18-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.485673.
3
Prenatal sex and race determination is a slippery slope.产前性别和种族鉴定是一条危险的道路。
J Med Ethics. 2004 Aug;30(4):376; author reply 376. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.003327.
4
Sex selection and the procreative liberty framework.性别选择与生育自由框架
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2013 Mar;23(1):1-18. doi: 10.1353/ken.2013.0000.
5
A defence of common sense: a reply to David Heyd's "The ethics of sex selection for non-medical reasons".对常识的辩护：回应大卫·海德的《非医学原因性别选择的伦理》
Ethical Perspect. 2004;11(1):84-7.
6
Male or female, we will create them: the ethics of sex selection for non-medical reasons.无论男女，我们都将创造他们：非医学原因进行性别选择的伦理问题。
Ethical Perspect. 2003;10(3-4):204-14. doi: 10.2143/ep.10.3.503886.
7
Resisting Sparrow's sexy reductio: selection principles and the social good.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jul;10(7):16-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.482642.
8
The value of sex in procreative reasons.性在生殖方面的价值。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jul;10(7):22-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.482649.
9
[Ethical aspects of preliminary sex selection of the fetus].[胎儿性别初步选择的伦理问题]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2006;45(5):36-9.
10
Is there a moral obligation to have children of only one sex?
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jul;10(7):26-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.485674.
引用本文的文献
1
Toward sustainable development goals in gender inequality: an analysis of gender preferences among urban pregnant women in a Southeast Asian country.迈向性别不平等的可持续发展目标：对东南亚某国城市孕妇性别偏好的分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06109-z.
2
Accounting for the Moral Significance of Technology: Revisiting the Case of Non-Medical Sex Selection.论技术的道德意义：重新审视非医学性别选择案例。
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Mar;16(1):75-85. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9891-4. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
3
Engendering Harm: A Critique of Sex Selection For "Family Balancing".造成伤害：对“家庭平衡”性别选择的批判
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Mar;15(1):123-137. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9835-4. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
4
A Feminist Critique of Justifications for Sex Selection.对性别选择理由的女性主义批判
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Sep;14(3):427-438. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9797-6. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
5
Son Preference of Immigrants to the United States: Data from U.S. Birth Certificates, 2004-2013.美国移民的儿子偏好：2004 - 2013年美国出生证明数据
J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Jun;20(3):711-716. doi: 10.1007/s10903-017-0589-1.
6
Persons and their parts: new reproductive technologies and risks of commodification.人与人体：新的生殖技术和商品化的风险。
Health Care Anal. 2009 Mar;17(1):36-46. doi: 10.1007/s10728-008-0107-7. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
7
Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US.社会性别选择与性别平衡：来自德国、英国和美国的实证证据。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006 Jul-Aug;23(7-8):311-8. doi: 10.1007/s10815-006-9064-y. Epub 2006 Sep 17.
8
Overcritical, overfriendly? A dialogue between a sociologist and a philosopher on genetic technology and its applications.过度批判，过度友好？一位社会学家与一位哲学家就基因技术及其应用展开的对话。
Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8(3):377-83. doi: 10.1007/s11019-005-1801-y.
9
Students' attitudes and potential behaviour to a competent patient's request for withdrawal of treatment as they pass through a modern medical curriculum.学生在学习现代医学课程过程中，对有行为能力的患者提出的停止治疗请求的态度和潜在行为。
J Med Ethics. 2004 Aug;30(4):371-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.002204.
10
Assisted reproduction: managing an unruly technology.辅助生殖：管理一项难以驾驭的技术。
Health Care Anal. 2004 Mar;12(1):41-9. doi: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000026652.41927.2a.
Zotero 插件