• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于使用尿激酶冲洗以预防皮下中心静脉导管管腔内定植导致菌血症的前瞻性双盲随机试验。

A prospective double-blind randomized trial of urokinase flushes to prevent bacteremia resulting from luminal colonization of subcutaneous central venous catheters.

作者信息

Aquino Victor M, Sandler Eric S, Mustafa Mahmoud M, Steele Jill W, Buchanan George R

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9063, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002 Dec;24(9):710-3. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200212000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00043426-200212000-00005
PMID:12468909
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to determine if central venous catheter (CVC)-related infection in children with cancer could be prevented by monthly flushing of the catheter with urokinase.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 1994 and July 1998, 103 patients with cancer were randomized at the time of subcutaneous CVC placement to receive monthly flushing of their catheters with either 5000 IU of urokinase-heparin or heparin alone. Patients subsequently had blood cultures taken from their CVCs during an episode of fever.

RESULTS

Seventy-four of the 103 patients (72%) enrolled in the study received at least 6 catheter flushes: 40 with urokinase-heparin and 34 with heparin. The median number of flushes was 9.5 in the urokinase-heparin group and 10.2 in the heparin-only group (P = 0.62). There were 5 positive blood cultures in the urokinase-heparin group and seven in patients receiving heparin alone (P = 0.27). Staphylococcus epidermidis was isolated from the blood of 3 patients receiving urokinase-heparin and 6 in those receiving heparin alone (P = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic monthly catheter flushes with 5000 IU urokinase did not significantly decrease the number of documented bacteremic events in children with cancer who have CVCs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定癌症患儿中心静脉导管(CVC)相关感染能否通过每月用尿激酶冲洗导管来预防。

患者与方法

1994年8月至1998年7月期间,103例癌症患者在皮下置入CVC时被随机分组,分别接受每月用5000国际单位尿激酶 - 肝素或仅用肝素冲洗导管。随后在发热期间从患者的CVC采集血培养样本。

结果

103例纳入研究的患者中有74例(72%)接受了至少6次导管冲洗:40例接受尿激酶 - 肝素冲洗,34例接受肝素冲洗。尿激酶 - 肝素组冲洗次数中位数为9.5次,仅肝素组为10.2次(P = 0.62)。尿激酶 - 肝素组有5次血培养阳性,仅接受肝素冲洗的患者中有7次血培养阳性(P = 0.27)。从接受尿激酶 - 肝素冲洗的3例患者血液中分离出表皮葡萄球菌,接受肝素冲洗的患者中有6例分离出表皮葡萄球菌(P = 0.17)。

结论

对于有CVC的癌症患儿,每月用5000国际单位尿激酶进行预防性导管冲洗并不能显著减少记录在案的菌血症事件数量。

相似文献

1
A prospective double-blind randomized trial of urokinase flushes to prevent bacteremia resulting from luminal colonization of subcutaneous central venous catheters.一项关于使用尿激酶冲洗以预防皮下中心静脉导管管腔内定植导致菌血症的前瞻性双盲随机试验。
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002 Dec;24(9):710-3. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200212000-00005.
2
Prophylactic urokinase in the management of long-term venous access devices in children: a Children's Oncology Group study.预防性使用尿激酶管理儿童长期静脉通路装置:一项儿童肿瘤学组的研究
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2718-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.019.
3
Prophylaxis with urokinase in pediatric oncology patients with central venous catheters.尿激酶对患有中心静脉导管的儿科肿瘤患者的预防作用。
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002 Apr-May;19(3):173-9. doi: 10.1080/088800102753541323.
4
Interventions other than anticoagulants and systemic antibiotics for prevention of central venous catheter-related infections in children with cancer.用于预防癌症患儿中心静脉导管相关感染的除抗凝剂和全身性抗生素以外的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8(12):CD007785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007785.pub2.
5
Randomized, double-blind trial of an antibiotic-lock technique for prevention of gram-positive central venous catheter-related infection in neutropenic patients with cancer.抗生素封管技术预防癌症中性粒细胞减少患者革兰氏阳性菌中心静脉导管相关感染的随机双盲试验
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Sep;43(9):2200-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.9.2200.
6
Prospective, randomized trial of two different modalities of flushing central venous catheters in pediatric patients with cancer.癌症患儿中心静脉导管两种不同冲洗方式的前瞻性随机试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 20;27(12):2059-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4860. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
7
Prevention of coagulase-negative staphylococcal central venous catheter-related infection using urokinase rinses: a randomized double-blind controlled trial in patients with hematologic malignancies.使用尿激酶冲洗预防凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌中心静脉导管相关感染:一项针对血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的随机双盲对照试验
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 20;26(3):428-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.7754.
8
Weekly prophylactic urokinase instillation in tunneled central venous access devices.隧道式中心静脉通路装置的每周预防性尿激酶灌注
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999 Nov-Dec;10(10):1330-4. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(99)70239-3.
9
Surface heparinization of central venous catheters reduces microbial colonization in vitro and in vivo: results from a prospective, randomized trial.中心静脉导管表面肝素化可减少体内外微生物定植:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果
Crit Care Med. 1996 Sep;24(9):1482-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199609000-00009.
10
Prevention of bacteremia attributed to luminal colonization of tunneled central venous catheters with vancomycin-susceptible organisms.
J Clin Oncol. 1990 Sep;8(9):1591-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.9.1591.

引用本文的文献

1
Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.肝素与 0.9%氯化钠封管预防成人中心静脉导管阻塞的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 18;7(7):CD008462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008462.pub4.
2
Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.肝素与0.9%氯化钠封管用于预防成人中心静脉导管堵塞的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 30;7(7):CD008462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008462.pub3.
3
Antibiotic and other lock treatments for tunnelled central venous catheter-related infections in children with cancer.
抗生素及其他封管治疗用于癌症患儿隧道式中心静脉导管相关感染
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 25;2013(6):CD008975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008975.pub2.
4
Thrombolytic therapy for central venous catheter occlusion.溶栓治疗中心静脉导管阻塞。
Haematologica. 2012 May;97(5):641-50. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.050492. Epub 2011 Dec 16.