Moore T M, Harvey J P
West J Med. 1976 Feb;124(2):92-8.
The almost bewildering variety of lesions that can affect bone contrasts sharply with the limited potential of bone to differentially respond to those lesions. This paradox can create a challenging problem when a bone lesion is shown on an x-ray film. Although heavily populated with pleuripotential primitive mesenchymal cells, there is seldom a histologic or radiographic change in the involved bone specific enough to allow a comfortable diagnostic autonomy to be enjoyed by surgical pathologists, radiologists or orthopaedic surgeons. Even when diligent and astute clinical evaluation has excluded infectious, parasitic, metabolic and metastatic causes of the change seen on x-ray studies, a physician is often still uncertain as to the exact nature of the lesion. A knowledge of the relative frequency of the common lesions, an acceptance that biopsy studies and treatment must be combined at times, an appreciation of the possibility of malignant change in a given lesion and a tendency to seek early consultation will likely lead to timely and accurate diagnosis. Once the diagnosis is made, optimum management must be selected. The best current opinion categorizes the lesions into treatment groups consisting of observation, curettage and graft, block excision, cryotherapy and radiotherapy.
几乎令人眼花缭乱的各种可影响骨骼的病变,与骨骼对这些病变做出不同反应的有限能力形成了鲜明对比。当X线片显示出骨病变时,这种矛盾会带来一个具有挑战性的问题。尽管受累骨骼中充满了多能性原始间充质细胞,但受累骨骼很少出现足够特异性的组织学或影像学改变,以使外科病理学家、放射科医生或骨科医生能够轻松地自主做出诊断。即使经过认真细致的临床评估,已排除了X线检查所见改变的感染性、寄生虫性、代谢性和转移性病因,医生通常仍无法确定病变的确切性质。了解常见病变的相对发生率,接受有时必须将活检研究与治疗相结合,认识到特定病变发生恶性变的可能性,并倾向于尽早咨询,可能会导致及时准确的诊断。一旦做出诊断,就必须选择最佳的治疗方法。目前最佳的观点是将病变分为观察、刮除植骨、整块切除、冷冻治疗和放射治疗等治疗组。