Suppr超能文献

经皮经肝门静脉栓塞术的并发症

Complications of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization.

作者信息

Kodama Yoshihisa, Shimizu Tadashi, Endo Hideho, Miyamoto Noriyuki, Miyasaka Kazuo

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, N15, W7, Kitaku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002 Dec;13(12):1233-7. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61970-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Percutaneous transhepatic portal vein (PV) embolization (PTPE) is a useful preoperative procedure for extended liver resection. The purpose of the present study was to assess the frequency of technical complications of PTPE and to discuss the risks of this procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PTPE was performed in 46 patients. Forty-seven procedures were performed because an initial puncture failure required that the procedure be performed twice in one patient. The technical success rate and technical complications were assessed. Complications were analyzed with regard to approach methods and puncture sites. Approach methods were categorized as contralateral or ipsilateral. Puncture sites were categorized into anterior, posterior, and lateral segments. The results were compared statistically with use of the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 45 of 47 procedures (95.7%). Complications occurred in seven of 47 procedures (14.9%), including pneumothorax in two, subcapsular hematoma in two, arterial puncture in one, pseudoaneurysm in one, hemobilia in one, and PV thrombosis in one. Subcapsular hematoma and pseudoaneurysm occurred in the same procedure. No patient died as a result of complications. There was no significant difference between the contralateral and ipsilateral approaches. The incidence of complications was significantly higher in procedures involving puncture of the posterior segment than in those involving puncture of the anterior segment (P =.0374).

CONCLUSION

In cases in which the anterior segment cannot be visualized for puncture, PTPE via the lateral segment or transileocolic portal embolization should be considered rather than PTPE via the posterior segment.

摘要

目的

经皮经肝门静脉栓塞术(PTPE)是扩大肝切除术有用的术前操作。本研究的目的是评估PTPE技术并发症的发生率并探讨该操作的风险。

材料与方法

对46例患者实施PTPE。共进行了47次操作,因为1例患者首次穿刺失败,需进行两次操作。评估技术成功率和技术并发症。对并发症按入路方法和穿刺部位进行分析。入路方法分为对侧或同侧。穿刺部位分为前、后、外侧段。结果采用Fisher精确检验进行统计学比较。

结果

47次操作中有45次获得技术成功(95.7%)。47次操作中有7次发生并发症(14.9%),包括气胸2例、肝包膜下血肿2例、动脉穿刺1例、假性动脉瘤1例、胆道出血1例、门静脉血栓形成1例。肝包膜下血肿和假性动脉瘤发生在同一例操作中。无患者因并发症死亡。对侧和同侧入路之间无显著差异。涉及后段穿刺的操作并发症发生率显著高于涉及前段穿刺的操作(P = 0.0374)。

结论

在前段无法显影进行穿刺的情况下,应考虑经外侧段进行PTPE或经回结肠门静脉栓塞术,而不是经后段进行PTPE。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验