Wong Simon Sin-Man, Yuen Brian Tsz-Yau, Lee Ryan Ka-Lok, Tsai Chris Siu-Chun, Cheung Yue Sun, Lee Kit Fai, Yu Simon Chun Ho
Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Mar;30(3):440-444. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.09.006.
Portal vein (PV) embolization (PVE) is traditionally performed via a PV sheath with selective embolization of PV branches. Here, the efficacy and safety of PVE with the use of only an 18-gauge needle is reported.
Consecutive patients who underwent PVE from 2009 through 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-five patients (mean age, 60 y ± 7.6; 38 men) underwent 45 PVE procedures. Hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastases accounted for 26 (58%), 13 (29%), and 6 (13%) patients, respectively. PVE was performed by puncturing a branch of right PV with an 18-gauge needle under US guidance. Via the same needle, direct portography was performed, followed by PVE with an N-butyl cyanoacrylate/Lipiodol mixture. Percentage increase of future liver remnant (FLR) volume and increase in ratio of FLR to total liver volume were estimated as measures of efficacy. Complications were reported according to Society of Interventional Radiology classification. Fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and dose-area product (DAP) were recorded.
Technical success rate was 100%. The median DAP, fluoroscopy time, and procedure time were 74,387 mGy·cm (IQR, 90,349 mGy·cm), 3.5 min (IQR, 2.10 min), and 24 min (IQR, 10.5 min). Among the 23 patients with complete CT volumetry data, mean increase in the ratio of FLR to total liver volume and percentage increase of FLR volume were 12.5% ± 7.7 and 50% ± 33, respectively. There were 3 minor complications (asymptomatic nonocclusive emboli in FLR) and 3 major complications (1 hepatic vein emboli, 1 subphrenic collection, and 1 hepatic infarct).
PVE via a sheathless 18-gauge needle approach is feasible, with satisfactory FLR hypertrophy.
传统上,门静脉(PV)栓塞术(PVE)是通过PV鞘进行PV分支的选择性栓塞。本文报道了仅使用18号针进行PVE的有效性和安全性。
回顾性分析2009年至2017年期间连续接受PVE的患者。45例患者(平均年龄60岁±7.6岁;38例男性)接受了45次PVE手术。肝细胞癌、胆管癌和转移瘤患者分别为26例(58%)、13例(29%)和6例(13%)。在超声引导下,用18号针穿刺右PV的一个分支进行PVE。通过同一根针进行直接门静脉造影,然后用N-丁基氰基丙烯酸酯/碘油混合物进行PVE。估计未来肝残余(FLR)体积的增加百分比和FLR与全肝体积之比的增加作为疗效指标。根据介入放射学会分类报告并发症。记录透视时间、手术时间和剂量面积乘积(DAP)。
技术成功率为100%。DAP中位数、透视时间和手术时间分别为74387 mGy·cm(四分位间距,90349 mGy·cm)、3.5分钟(四分位间距,2.10分钟)和24分钟(四分位间距,10.5分钟)。在23例有完整CT容积数据的患者中,FLR与全肝体积之比的平均增加百分比和FLR体积的增加百分比分别为12.5%±7.7和50%±33。有3例轻微并发症(FLR中无症状非闭塞性栓子)和3例严重并发症(1例肝静脉栓子、1例膈下积液和1例肝梗死)。
通过无鞘18号针途径进行PVE是可行的,FLR肥大效果良好。