Suppr超能文献

中风后足下垂的生物反馈治疗与标准康复技术的比较(第2部分):对神经传导速度和痉挛的影响

Biofeedback treatment of foot drop after stroke compared with standard rehabilitation technique (part 2): effects on nerve conduction velocity and spasticity.

作者信息

Takebe K, Kukulka C G, Narayan M G, Basmajian J V

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1976 Jan;57(1):9-11.

PMID:1247378
Abstract

Peroneal nerve conduction velocity (NCV) was determined in 20 hemiplegic patients with chronic foot drop. At the initial visit, relative slowing of NCV of the affected leg was observed. The patients were randomly separated into two groups, and treated for five weeks by different therapies--group 1 by conventional physical exercise and group 2 by physical exercise plus biofeedback training. Of these patients, six with severe spasticity were selected from each group to investigate the change of spasticity by patellar tendon reflex. Although with biofeedback remarkable improvement of function was observed (and reported in an earlier paper), there was no significant change of NCV and spasticity.

摘要

对20例慢性足下垂偏瘫患者测定了腓总神经传导速度(NCV)。初次就诊时,观察到患侧腿的NCV相对减慢。患者被随机分为两组,采用不同疗法治疗5周——第1组采用传统体育锻炼,第2组采用体育锻炼加生物反馈训练。从每组中选出6例严重痉挛患者,通过髌腱反射研究痉挛的变化。尽管观察到(并在较早的一篇论文中报道)生物反馈使功能有显著改善,但NCV和痉挛并无明显变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验