Link Mark S, Saeed Mohammad, Gupta Neera, Homoud Munther K, Wang Paul J, Estes N A Mark
The New England Cardiac Arrhythmiqa Service, New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Nov;13(11):1103-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.01103.x.
Ventricular fibrillation and ventricular flutter (cycle length < or = 230 msec) induced at electrophysiologic studies are thought to be nonspecific findings in patients presenting with syncope of unknown origin. However, there are limited data on the prognosis of these patients in long-term follow-up.
We followed 274 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease presenting with syncope or presyncope who underwent electrophysiologic studies from January 1992 to June 1999 and assessed the risk of subsequent arrhythmias stratified by the electrophysiologic result at the time of their presentation with syncope. Ventricular fibrillation was induced in 23 patients (8%); ventricular flutter in 24 (9%), sustained ventricular tachycardia in 41 (15%); and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia 42 (15%). In 37 +/- 25 months of follow-up, there have been ventricular arrhythmias in 34 patients, including 3 (13%) of 23 who had induced ventricular fibrillation, and 7 (30%) of 24 with induced ventricular flutter, compared to 13 (32%) of 41 with sustained ventricular tachycardia, 7 (17%) of 42 with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and only 4 (3%) of 144 noninducible patients (P < 0.001 for induced ventricular fibrillation and ventricular flutter vs noninducible patients). The inducibility of ventricular fibrillation and ventricular flutter were independent risk factors for arrhythmia occurrence in follow-up.
Ventricular fibrillation and ventricular flutter induced at electrophysiologic studies have prognostic significance for arrhythmia occurrence in patients presenting with syncope. These induced arrhythmias may not be as nonspecific as previously thought and treatment should be considered for these patients.
在电生理研究中诱发的心室颤动和心室扑动(周期长度≤230毫秒)被认为是不明原因晕厥患者的非特异性表现。然而,关于这些患者长期随访预后的数据有限。
我们对1992年1月至1999年6月期间连续274例因晕厥或先兆晕厥而接受电生理研究的冠心病患者进行了随访,并根据他们晕厥发作时的电生理结果对后续心律失常风险进行了分层评估。23例患者(8%)诱发了心室颤动;24例(9%)诱发了心室扑动;41例(15%)诱发了持续性室性心动过速;42例(15%)诱发了非持续性室性心动过速。在37±25个月的随访中,34例患者出现了室性心律失常,其中23例诱发心室颤动的患者中有3例(13%),24例诱发心室扑动的患者中有7例(30%),41例持续性室性心动过速的患者中有13例(32%),42例非持续性室性心动过速的患者中有7例(17%),而144例未诱发出心律失常的患者中只有4例(3%)(诱发心室颤动和心室扑动的患者与未诱发出心律失常的患者相比,P<0.001)。心室颤动和心室扑动的诱发性是随访期间心律失常发生的独立危险因素。
电生理研究中诱发的心室颤动和心室扑动对晕厥患者心律失常的发生具有预后意义。这些诱发的心律失常可能不像以前认为的那样是非特异性的,应对这些患者考虑进行治疗。