Langford M J, Myers R C
DynPort Vaccine Company, Vaccine Development, Fredrick, MD 21702, USA.
Dev Biol (Basel). 2002;110:107-12.
Today there is an increasing need to license vaccines for the protection of individuals against bio-warfare and bio-terrorism. While the need is apparent, the actual road to developing, producing and licensing such vaccines successfully is as yet undefined. Bio-defence vaccine candidates may come from several sources. They may come from vaccines that were previously licensed but are no longer in production, vaccines that are currently in an IND status, vaccines currently licensed in foreign countries, and newer vaccines currently under development. The issues that apply to the development and licensing of these vaccines can be defined by currently accepted standards for manufacture, and the requirement to demonstrate safety and efficacy to a level that gives the scientific and medical community, regulatory agencies, users and the public at large confidence. Requirements for manufacturing and demonstration of safety will be consistent with vaccines being developed for traditional purposes. However, demonstration of efficacy will be more difficult. Because field trials for these vaccines are generally not feasible and the conduct of human challenge studies is generally considered unethical, the demonstration of efficacy will need to be based on existing efficacy data, a thorough understanding of both the disease's pathogenesis and mechanism of protection, the ability to identify surrogate markers for efficacy, and the use of the proposed FDA "animal rule".
如今,为保护个人免受生物战和生物恐怖主义威胁而对疫苗进行许可的需求日益增加。虽然这种需求显而易见,但成功研发、生产此类疫苗并获得许可的实际途径尚未明确。生物防御候选疫苗可能有多种来源。它们可能来自以前获得许可但已不再生产的疫苗、目前处于研究性新药(IND)状态的疫苗、目前在国外获得许可的疫苗,以及目前正在研发的新型疫苗。适用于这些疫苗研发和许可的问题可由当前公认的生产标准以及向科学界、医学界、监管机构、使用者和广大公众证明达到一定安全和有效性水平的要求来界定。生产和安全性证明的要求将与为传统目的研发的疫苗一致。然而,有效性证明将更加困难。由于这些疫苗的现场试验通常不可行,且进行人体激发试验通常被认为不符合伦理道德,有效性证明将需要基于现有的有效性数据、对疾病发病机制和保护机制的透彻理解、识别有效性替代标志物的能力,以及使用美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)提议的“动物规则”。