Mintzer M Z, Griffiths R R
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Biology Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA.
Behav Pharmacol. 2002 Dec;13(8):653-8. doi: 10.1097/00008877-200212000-00007.
The effects of alcohol (0.80 g/kg) and the benzodiazepine hypnotic triazolam (0.25 mg/70 kg) were compared directly in a double-dummy, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures design in 18 healthy volunteers. While alcohol (0.80 g/kg) and triazolam (0.25 mg/70 kg) produced comparable levels of psychomotor performance impairment, a dissociation was observed, such that the magnitude of memory impairment (measured by d', participants' sensitivity in discriminating between old and new words in the recognition memory paradigm) was greater with triazolam than with alcohol, whereas subjective ratings of the overall strength of drug effect were higher with alcohol than with triazolam. Participants also adopted a more conservative response bias in the recognition memory paradigm in the alcohol (0.80 g/kg) condition relative to both placebo and triazolam (0.25 mg/70 kg). In addition to characterizing the adverse effects of two widely used psychoactive substances, the present results may also contribute to the understanding of underlying neurochemical mechanisms.
在一项双模拟、双盲、安慰剂对照、重复测量设计中,对18名健康志愿者直接比较了酒精(0.80克/千克)和苯二氮䓬类催眠药三唑仑(0.25毫克/70千克)的效果。虽然酒精(0.80克/千克)和三唑仑(0.25毫克/70千克)产生了相当程度的精神运动功能损害,但观察到一种分离现象,即三唑仑导致的记忆损害程度(通过d'测量,即参与者在识别记忆范式中区分新旧单词的敏感度)大于酒精,而药物效果总体强度的主观评分酒精高于三唑仑。相对于安慰剂和三唑仑(0.25毫克/70千克),参与者在酒精(0.80克/千克)条件下的识别记忆范式中也采用了更保守的反应偏差。除了描述两种广泛使用的精神活性物质的不良反应外,本研究结果也可能有助于理解潜在的神经化学机制。