Vickers M D
Br Med J. 1976 Feb 7;1(6005):328-31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6005.328.
In the general euphoria over the many views in the Merrison Report that the profession welcomed too little attention has been paid to what has been said about specialist registration. The report contains several basic confusions and a serious misunderstanding of the nature of specialist medical training and practice. It makes several cardinal errors in thinking that some notorious problems related to NHS staffing are also related to a lack of an effective specialist register, and it shows how the creation of such a register would largely destroy the authority of the colleges and faculties. Nowhere in the report is there any convincing argument to show that specialist registration would confer advantages sufficient to outweigh the disadvantages. To let specialist registration in the UK slip in on the irrelevant coat tails of EEC requirements would be a grave dereliction of the long-term interests of medical practice and patient care. The General Medical Council is holding a conference in which this topic is to be discussed on 24 February 1976 and it is still not too late for the profession to think again on this topic.
在对《梅里森报告》中诸多观点普遍感到欣喜的氛围中,该行业所欢迎的内容却很少受到关注,而关于专科医生注册的论述更是无人问津。这份报告存在一些基本的混淆,并且对专科医学培训和实践的本质存在严重误解。它犯了几个主要错误,认为一些与国民保健制度人员配备相关的臭名昭著的问题也与缺乏有效的专科医生注册有关,还表明创建这样一个注册系统将在很大程度上破坏各学院和学会的权威。报告中没有任何令人信服的论据表明专科医生注册带来的优势足以超过其劣势。让英国的专科医生注册搭乘欧洲经济共同体要求这一无关紧要的便车,将严重损害医疗实践和患者护理的长期利益。普通医学委员会将于1976年2月24日召开一次会议讨论这个话题,该行业重新思考这个话题仍为时不晚。