Saleh Khaled J, Dykes Daryll C, Tweedie Richard L, Mohamed Khadeeja, Ravichandran Ashwin, Saleh Raied M, Gioe Terence J, Heck David A
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Dec;17(8):967-77. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.35823.
The objective of this study was to perform a systematic literature review to describe patient outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision procedures using various global knee score ratings. English language articles published from 1966 through 2000 were identified through a computerized literature search and bibliography review. A multistage assessment was used to determine the articles containing data that could meet our objective. Meta-analyses of global knee scores were undertaken using a fixed effects model with the assumption that the variances of each individual measurement were identical across studies. The initial inclusion criteria were met by 58 articles with a total of 1965 patients. There were 42 articles comprising 45 unique patient cohorts and a total of 1515 patients that had sufficient global knee score data for analysis and were used in the meta-analyses. Revision total knee arthroplasty is an effective procedure for failed knee arthroplasties based on global knee rating scales.
本研究的目的是进行一项系统的文献综述,以描述使用各种全膝关节评分标准进行全膝关节置换翻修手术后的患者结局。通过计算机文献检索和参考文献回顾,确定了1966年至2000年发表的英文文章。采用多阶段评估来确定包含能够满足我们目标的数据的文章。使用固定效应模型对全膝关节评分进行荟萃分析,假设各研究中每个个体测量的方差相同。58篇文章共纳入1965例患者,符合初始纳入标准。42篇文章包含45个独特的患者队列,共1515例患者有足够的全膝关节评分数据用于分析,并被纳入荟萃分析。基于全膝关节评分量表,翻修全膝关节置换术是治疗失败的膝关节置换术的有效方法。