• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感染和假体周围骨折是无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后失败的主要原因。

Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Department of Orthopaedics, Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Aug;141(8):1373-1383. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03698-8. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-020-03698-8
PMID:33515323
Abstract

AIM

The purpose of this study was to clarify the medium to long term survival of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKAs) and identify the common modes of failure following RTKAs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-center, retrospective study included all aseptic RTKAs performed at three tertiary referral hospitals between 2003 and 2016. Patients were excluded if the revision was for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) or they had previously undergone revision surgery. Minor revisions not involving the tibial or femoral components were also excluded. Demographics, surgical data and post-operative outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Survival analysis was performed and the reasons for revision failure identified.

RESULTS

Of 235 aseptic RTKAs identified, 14.8% underwent re-revision at mean follow-up of 8.3 years. Survivorship of RTKA was 93% at 2 years and 83% at 8 years. Average age at revision was 72.9 years (range 53-91.5). The most common reasons for failure following RTKA were periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (40%), periprosthetic fracture (25.7%) and aseptic loosening (14.3%). Of those whose RTKA failed, the average survival was 3.33 years (8 days-11.4 years). No demographic or surgical factors were found to influence RTKA survival on univariate or multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

PJI and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of re-revision surgery following aseptic revision TKA. Efforts to improve outcomes of aseptic revision TKA should focus on these areas, particularly prevention of PJI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在阐明无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术(RTKA)的中远期生存率,并确定 RTKA 后常见的失败模式。

材料与方法

一项多中心、回顾性研究纳入了 2003 年至 2016 年期间在三家三级转诊医院进行的所有无菌性 RTKA。如果翻修为假体关节感染(PJI)或患者之前已接受过翻修手术,则将患者排除在外。也排除了不涉及胫骨或股骨部件的小翻修。记录并分析患者的人口统计学、手术数据和术后结果。进行生存分析并确定翻修失败的原因。

结果

在 235 例无菌性 RTKA 中,14.8%在平均 8.3 年的随访时进行了再次翻修。RTKA 的 2 年生存率为 93%,8 年生存率为 83%。再次翻修时的平均年龄为 72.9 岁(53-91.5 岁)。RTKA 后失败的最常见原因是假体周围关节感染(PJI)(40%)、假体周围骨折(25.7%)和无菌性松动(14.3%)。在 RTKA 失败的患者中,平均生存时间为 3.33 年(8 天-11.4 年)。单因素和多因素分析均未发现任何人口统计学或手术因素对 RTKA 生存率有影响。

结论

PJI 和假体周围骨折是无菌性翻修 TKA 后再次翻修手术的主要原因。改善无菌性翻修 TKA 结果的努力应集中在这些方面,特别是预防 PJI。

相似文献

1
Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.感染和假体周围骨折是无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后失败的主要原因。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Aug;141(8):1373-1383. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03698-8. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
2
Contemporary failure aetiologies of the primary, posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.初次后稳定型全膝关节置换术的当代失败病因
Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):647-652. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0617.R3.
3
Low Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Intraosseous Vancomycin.骨内万古霉素用于无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的风险低。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8S1):S305-S309. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.030. Epub 2024 May 23.
4
Younger age is associated with a higher risk of early periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic mechanical failure after total knee arthroplasty.年龄较轻与全膝关节置换术后早期假体周围关节感染和无菌性机械故障的风险增加相关。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):529-35. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00545.
5
Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees.人工关节周围感染是现代膝关节置换术失败的主要原因:对11134例膝关节的分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2194-2201. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5396-4. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
6
Outcomes of single- and two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic joint infection : long-term outcomes of changing clinical practice in a specialist centre.单阶段和两阶段翻修全膝关节置换术治疗慢性假体周围关节感染的结果:在专门中心改变临床实践的长期结果。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Aug;103-B(8):1373-1379. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B8.BJJ-2021-0224.R1.
7
Periprosthetic Infection: Major Cause of Early Failure of Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.人工关节周围感染:初次及翻修全膝关节置换早期失败的主要原因
J Knee Surg. 2019 Oct;32(10):941-946. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1672203. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
8
Osteoporosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Higher 5-Year Implant-Related Complications.骨质疏松症与全膝关节置换术:更高的 5 年与假体相关并发症。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Apr;39(4):948-953.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.045. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
9
Periprosthetic knee infection reconstruction with a hinged prosthesis: Implant survival and risk factors for treatment failure.带铰链假体的人工膝关节周围感染重建:植入物存活率及治疗失败的危险因素。
Knee. 2020 Jun;27(3):1035-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
10
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With Increased Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Relative to Noninfectious Revisions.关节置换翻修术治疗假体周围关节感染的术后发病率和死亡率相对高于非感染性翻修术。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):521-526. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Intra-articular injection of vancomycin after arthrotomy closure following gentamicin-impregnated bone cementation in primary total knee arthroplasty provides a high intra-articular concentration while avoiding systemic toxicity: a prospective study.在初次全膝关节置换术中,在庆大霉素骨水泥固定后的关节切开闭合后关节内注射万古霉素,可提供高关节内浓度,同时避免全身毒性:一项前瞻性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):856. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05357-9.
2
Causes of Revision of Total Knee Arthroplasties in a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.巴西一家三级医院全膝关节置换术翻修的原因
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 7;59(5):e696-e701. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757304. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Why are revision knee replacements failing?翻修膝关节置换手术为何会失败?
Knee. 2019 Jun;26(3):774-778. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 8.
2
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of a hybrid fixation revision total knee arthroplasty system at short to mid-term follow-up.短期至中期随访的混合固定翻修全膝关节置换系统的临床和影像学结果。
Knee. 2019 Jan;26(1):240-249. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
3
Hip and Knee Section, Prevention, Prosthesis Factors: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections.
Tranexamic Acid as a Preventive Strategy Against Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review.
氨甲环酸作为无菌性翻修关节置换术中假体周围感染的预防策略:一项综述
Cureus. 2024 Oct 3;16(10):e70796. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70796. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Re-revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Causes, Risk Factors and Results.全膝关节置换翻修术:原因、风险因素及结果
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(5):328-332. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.75456.3490.
5
Maintenance of the joint line and posterior condylar offset are the most notable variables for successful outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty.维持关节线和后髁偏心距是翻修全膝关节置换术成功的最显著变量。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jan;144(1):357-367. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05063-x. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
6
Microbiological Profile of Periprosthetic Knee Infections in a Brazilian Unified Health System Hospital Specialized in Highly Complex Orthopedic Surgeries.巴西一家专门从事高复杂性骨外科手术的统一卫生系统医院中人工膝关节周围感染的微生物学特征
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2023 Jun 29;58(3):443-448. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758368. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Risk of Interprosthetic Femur Fracture Is Associated with Implant Spacing-A Biomechanical Study.人工关节间股骨骨折风险与植入物间距相关——一项生物力学研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 24;12(9):3095. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093095.
8
A mapping review on preoperative prognostic factors and outcome measures of revision total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节翻修术术前预后因素及结局指标的映射综述
Bone Jt Open. 2023 May 10;4(5):338-356. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.45.BJO-2022-0157.R1.
9
Treatment of periprosthetic knee infection and coexistent periprosthetic fracture: A case report and literature review.人工膝关节感染合并假体周围骨折的治疗:一例病例报告及文献综述
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Apr 6;11(10):2321-2328. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i10.2321.
10
Biological Response Evaluation of Human Fetal Osteoblast Cells and Bacterial Cells on Fractal Silver Dendrites for Bone Tissue Engineering.人胎儿成骨细胞和细菌细胞在用于骨组织工程的分形银树枝状晶体上的生物学反应评估
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023 Mar 20;13(6):1107. doi: 10.3390/nano13061107.
髋膝关节部分、预防、假体因素:骨科感染国际共识会议论文集
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2S):S309-S320. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
4
The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria.2018 年人工髋关节和膝关节感染定义:基于循证和验证的标准。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1309-1314.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
5
Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees.人工关节周围感染是现代膝关节置换术失败的主要原因:对11134例膝关节的分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2194-2201. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5396-4. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
6
Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换翻修术的病因及临床结果
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017 Jun 1;29(2):104-109. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.16.035.
7
Predicting the Burden of Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Simulation of a 20-Year Horizon.预测翻修膝关节置换术的负担:20年展望模拟
Value Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(5):680-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
8
New Zealand Joint Registry data underestimates the rate of prosthetic joint infection.新西兰关节注册处的数据低估了人工关节感染的发生率。
Acta Orthop. 2016 Aug;87(4):346-50. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1171639. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
9
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Use of a Constrained Condylar Knee Prosthesis.使用限制性髁膝关节假体进行翻修全膝关节置换术的长期临床结果和生存率
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Oct;30(10):1804-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.019. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
10
The problem total knee replacement: systematic, comprehensive and efficient evaluation.全膝关节置换问题:系统、全面且高效的评估
Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11 Supple A):105-11. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34531.