• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

唐氏综合征产前诊断的偏好评估:35岁作为截断值是否合理?

Preference assessment of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: is 35 years a rational cutoff?

作者信息

Grobman W A, Dooley S L, Welshman E E, Pergament E, Calhoun E A

机构信息

Sections of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Reproductive Genetics, Northwestern University Medical School Institute for Social Research and Health Policy Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2002 Dec;22(13):1195-200. doi: 10.1002/pd.494.

DOI:10.1002/pd.494
PMID:12478632
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the perceptions of miscarriage and birth of a child with Down syndrome among pregnant women and to evaluate the implications of these preferences for the traditional 35-year old maternal age risk boundary.

METHODS

An interviewer-administered survey was given to 186 pregnant women receiving antepartum care at a university hospital. Preferences, as reflected by utilities, for birth of a child with Down syndrome and pregnancy miscarriage, stratified by patient characteristics, were assessed.

RESULTS

The utility for the birth of a child with Down syndrome decreased (p < 0.001) as clinical severity increased from mild (0.78) to severe (0.65). Miscarriage of a pregnancy had a mean utility of 0.76 +/- 0.31. Women who desired prenatal diagnosis had a utility value for miscarriage (0.79 +/- 0.28) that was significantly higher than for the birth of a child with Down syndrome of unknown severity (0.73 +/- 0.27). In multivariable logistic regression, desire for prenatal diagnosis was the only factor associated with a preference of miscarriage over birth of an affected child (odds ratio 2.26, 95% confidence interval 1.03, 4.96).

CONCLUSION

Women who desire prenatal diagnosis do not perceive the birth of a child with Down syndrome and a pregnancy miscarriage to be equivalent health states. This finding calls into question the rationale of the 35-year-old maternal age criterion and suggests that actual patient preferences should be better incorporated into the decision to offer definitive prenatal diagnosis.

摘要

目的

比较孕妇对唐氏综合征患儿出生和流产的看法,并评估这些偏好对传统的35岁产妇年龄风险界限的影响。

方法

对在大学医院接受产前护理的186名孕妇进行了访谈式调查。评估了按患者特征分层的对唐氏综合征患儿出生和妊娠流产的偏好(以效用值表示)。

结果

随着临床严重程度从轻度(0.78)增加到重度(0.65),唐氏综合征患儿出生的效用值下降(p < 0.001)。妊娠流产的平均效用值为0.76 +/- 0.31。希望进行产前诊断的女性对流产的效用值(0.79 +/- 0.28)显著高于对严重程度未知的唐氏综合征患儿出生的效用值(0.73 +/- 0.27)。在多变量逻辑回归中,希望进行产前诊断是唯一与偏好流产而非患病患儿出生相关的因素(优势比2.26,95%置信区间1.03,4.96)。

结论

希望进行产前诊断的女性并不认为唐氏综合征患儿出生和妊娠流产是同等的健康状况。这一发现对35岁产妇年龄标准的合理性提出了质疑,并表明在决定提供确定性产前诊断时应更好地纳入患者的实际偏好。

相似文献

1
Preference assessment of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: is 35 years a rational cutoff?唐氏综合征产前诊断的偏好评估:35岁作为截断值是否合理?
Prenat Diagn. 2002 Dec;22(13):1195-200. doi: 10.1002/pd.494.
2
The utility assessment of Chinese pregnant women towards the birth of a baby with Down syndrome compared to a procedure-related miscarriage.与因手术相关的流产相比,中国孕妇对唐氏综合征患儿出生的效用评估。
Prenat Diagn. 2006 Sep;26(9):819-24. doi: 10.1002/pd.1511.
3
Perceived risk of prenatal diagnostic procedure-related miscarriage and Down syndrome among pregnant women.孕妇对产前诊断程序相关流产和唐氏综合征的感知风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;198(3):333.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.045. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
4
Procedure-related miscarriages and Down syndrome-affected births: implications for prenatal testing based on women's preferences.
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Oct;96(4):511-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00969-8.
5
Do women prefer to have screening tests for Down syndrome that have the lowest screen-positive rate or the highest detection rate?女性更倾向于进行唐氏综合征筛查测试,是选择筛查阳性率最低的还是检测率最高的?
Prenat Diagn. 2003 Oct;23(10):828-32. doi: 10.1002/pd.701.
6
Preferences of women facing a prenatal diagnostic choice: long-term outcomes matter most.
Prenat Diagn. 1999 Aug;19(8):711-6.
7
Fitting observed and theoretical choices - women's choices about prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome.匹配观察到的与理论上的选择——女性对唐氏综合征产前诊断的选择。
Health Econ. 2008 May;17(5):557-77. doi: 10.1002/hec.1276.
8
Miscarriage after invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures: how much risk our pregnant women are willing to take?侵入性产前诊断程序后的流产:我们的孕妇愿意承担多大风险?
Prenat Diagn. 2009 Sep;29(9):870-4. doi: 10.1002/pd.2305.
9
Long-term trends for socio-economic differences in prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: diffusion of services or persistence of disparities?唐氏综合征产前诊断中社会经济差异的长期趋势:服务的普及还是差距的持续存在?
BJOG. 2008 Aug;115(9):1087-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01794.x. Epub 2008 May 30.
10
Socioeconomic and state-level differences in prenatal diagnosis and live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome in the United States.美国唐氏综合征产前诊断及活产患病率的社会经济和州级差异。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2003 Dec;51(6):617-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Ignored and undervalued in public health: a systematic review of health state utility values associated with syphilis infection.在公共卫生中被忽视和低估:与梅毒感染相关的健康状态效用值的系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Feb 13;22(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02234-1.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Exome Sequencing versus Targeted Gene Panels for Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Effusions and Non-Immune Hydrops Fetalis.外显子组测序与靶向基因panel 用于胎儿积液和非免疫性胎儿水肿的产前诊断的成本效益比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Nov;4(6):100724. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100724. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
3
Methadone, Buprenorphine, or Detoxification for Management of Perinatal Opioid Use Disorder: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
美沙酮、丁丙诺啡或解毒疗法治疗围产期阿片类药物使用障碍:成本效益分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;134(5):921-931. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003503.
4
Effect of enhanced information, values clarification, and removal of financial barriers on use of prenatal genetic testing: a randomized clinical trial.强化信息、价值观澄清及消除经济障碍对产前基因检测使用的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2014 Sep 24;312(12):1210-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.11479.
5
What is the optimal gestational age for women with gestational diabetes type A1 to deliver?A1型妊娠期糖尿病女性的最佳分娩孕周是多少?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;211(4):418.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
6
Maternal age-based prenatal screening for chromosomal disorders: attitudes of women and health care providers toward changes.基于孕妇年龄的染色体疾病产前筛查:女性和医疗保健提供者对变化的态度。
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Jan;59(1):e39-47.
7
Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.染色体微阵列分析与核型分析在产前诊断中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 6;367(23):2175-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203382.
8
Genetic counseling for prenatal testing: where is the discussion about disability?产前检测的遗传咨询:关于残疾的讨论在哪里?
J Genet Couns. 2012 Dec;21(6):814-24. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9484-z. Epub 2012 Aug 17.