• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多态性CYP2C19与N-乙酰化:人体动力学变异性及与途径相关的不确定性因素

Polymorphic CYP2C19 and N-acetylation: human variability in kinetics and pathway-related uncertainty factors.

作者信息

Dorne J L C M, Walton K, Renwick A G

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Group, University of Southampton, Biomedical Sciences Building, Bassett Crescent East, Southampton SO16 7PX, UK.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 2003 Feb;41(2):225-45. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00210-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00210-7
PMID:12480299
Abstract

CYP2C19-mediated oxidation and N-acetylation constitute major phase I and phase II polymorphic pathways of xenobiotic metabolism in humans. Analysis of human variability in kinetics for these pathways has been carried out for compounds metabolised extensively (>60%) by these routes. Data for minor substrates for CYP2C19 metabolism (10-60%) have also been analysed. Published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in CYP2C19 non-phenotyped healthy adults (NPs), and phenotyped extensive (EMs), slow-extensive (SEMs) and poor metabolisers (PMs) have been analysed using data for parameters that relate primarily to chronic exposure (metabolic and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration-time curve) and primarily to acute exposure (peak concentration). Similar analyses were performed for the N-acetylation pathway using data for fast acetylators (FA) and slow acetylators (SA). Interindividual variability in the kinetics of CYP2C19 substrates after oral dosage was greater in EMs than in NPs (60 vs 43% for clearances and 54 vs 45% for Cmax). Lower variability was found for N-acetylation for both phenotypes (32 and 22% for FA and SA, respectively). The internal dose of CYP2C19 substrates in PM subjects would be 31-fold higher than in EMs, while for N-acetylated substrates there was a three-fold difference between SA and FA subjects. Pathway-related uncertainty factors were above the default safety factor of 3.16 for most subgroups and values of 52 and 5.2 would be necessary to cover to the 99th centile of the poor metaboliser phenotype for CYP2C19 and N-acetylation, respectively. An exponential relationship (R(2)=0.86) was found between the extent of CYP2C19 metabolism and the difference in internal dose between EMs and PMs. The kinetic default factor (3.16) would cover PMs for substrates for which CYP2C19 was responsible for up to 20-30% of the metabolism in EMs.

摘要

细胞色素P450 2C19(CYP2C19)介导的氧化作用和N - 乙酰化作用构成了人体对外源物质代谢的主要I相和II相多态性途径。对于通过这些途径大量代谢(>60%)的化合物,已对这些途径的人体动力学变异性进行了分析。也分析了CYP2C19代谢的次要底物(10 - 60%)的数据。已使用主要与慢性暴露(代谢清除率和总清除率、血浆浓度 - 时间曲线下面积)以及主要与急性暴露(峰浓度)相关的参数数据,对CYP2C19未分型的健康成年人(NPs)以及已分型的广泛代谢者(EMs)、慢广泛代谢者(SEMs)和代谢不良者(PMs)进行了口服和静脉给药后的已发表药代动力学研究分析。使用快速乙酰化者(FA)和慢乙酰化者(SA)的数据,对N - 乙酰化途径进行了类似分析。口服给药后,CYP2C19底物动力学的个体间变异性在EMs中比在NPs中更大(清除率分别为60%对43%,Cmax分别为54%对45%)。两种表型的N - 乙酰化变异性较低(FA和SA分别为32%和22%)。PM受试者中CYP2C19底物的体内剂量比EMs高31倍,而对于N - 乙酰化底物,SA和FA受试者之间存在3倍差异。对于大多数亚组,途径相关的不确定因素高于默认安全系数3.16,分别需要52和5.2的值才能涵盖CYP2C19和N - 乙酰化代谢不良者表型的第99百分位数。在CYP2C19代谢程度与EMs和PMs之间的体内剂量差异之间发现了指数关系(R² = 0.86)。动力学默认因子(3.16)将涵盖CYP2C19在EMs中负责高达20 - 30%代谢的底物的PMs。

相似文献

1
Polymorphic CYP2C19 and N-acetylation: human variability in kinetics and pathway-related uncertainty factors.多态性CYP2C19与N-乙酰化:人体动力学变异性及与途径相关的不确定性因素
Food Chem Toxicol. 2003 Feb;41(2):225-45. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00210-7.
2
Human variability in polymorphic CYP2D6 metabolism: is the kinetic default uncertainty factor adequate?细胞色素P450 2D6(CYP2D6)多态性代谢中的个体差异:动力学默认不确定系数是否足够?
Food Chem Toxicol. 2002 Nov;40(11):1633-56. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00117-5.
3
Human variability in CYP3A4 metabolism and CYP3A4-related uncertainty factors for risk assessment.CYP3A4代谢中的个体差异及用于风险评估的CYP3A4相关不确定性因素。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2003 Feb;41(2):201-24. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00209-0.
4
Human variability in xenobiotic metabolism and pathway-related uncertainty factors for chemical risk assessment: a review.化学风险评估中异源物质代谢的人类变异性及途径相关不确定性因素:综述
Food Chem Toxicol. 2005 Feb;43(2):203-16. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.05.011.
5
Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism.细胞色素P450 2C19基因多态性的临床意义
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(12):913-58. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241120-00002.
6
Pharmacogenetic roles of CYP2C19 and CYP2B6 in the metabolism of R- and S-mephobarbital in humans.CYP2C19和CYP2B6在人体中对R-和S-美索比妥代谢的药物遗传学作用。
Pharmacogenetics. 2004 Aug;14(8):549-56. doi: 10.1097/01.fpc.0000114764.78957.22.
7
Inter-phenotypic differences in CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 metabolism: Bayesian meta-regression of human population variability in kinetics and application in chemical risk assessment.CYP2C9和CYP2C19代谢的表型间差异:人群动力学变异性的贝叶斯元回归及其在化学风险评估中的应用
Toxicol Lett. 2021 Feb 1;337:111-120. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.11.016. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
8
The effect of aging on the relationship between the cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype and omeprazole pharmacokinetics.衰老对细胞色素P450 2C19基因型与奥美拉唑药代动力学之间关系的影响。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(11):1179-89. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200544110-00005.
9
Phenotype-genotype relationship and clinical effects of citalopram in Chinese patients.西酞普兰在中国患者中的表型-基因型关系及临床疗效
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Aug;26(4):367-72. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000227355.54074.14.
10
Effects of clarithromycin and verapamil on rabeprazole pharmacokinetics between CYP2C19 genotypes.克拉霉素和维拉帕米对不同CYP2C19基因型患者雷贝拉唑药代动力学的影响。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Aug;62(8):597-603. doi: 10.1007/s00228-006-0152-9. Epub 2006 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
NAT2 genetic variations among South Indian populations.南印度人群中的NAT2基因变异。
Hum Genome Var. 2014 Oct 2;1:14014. doi: 10.1038/hgv.2014.14. eCollection 2014.
2
Therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic tests as tools in pharmacovigilance.治疗药物监测和药物遗传学检测作为药物警戒的工具。
Drug Saf. 2006;29(9):735-68. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629090-00001.