Cole Charles Andrew, Shafer Deborah
Penn State University, Center for Watershed Stewardship, 227 East Calder Way, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801, USA.
Environ Manage. 2002 Oct;30(4):508-15. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2717-4.
Twenty-three Section 404 permits in central Pennsylvania (covering a wetland age range of 1-14 years) were examined to determine the type of mitigation wetland permitted, how the sites were built, and what success criteria were used for evaluation. Most permits allowed for mitigation out-of-kind, either vegetatively or through hydrogeomorphic class. The mitigation process has resulted in a shift from impacted wetlands dominated by woody species to less vegetated mitigation wetlands, a trend that appears to be occurring nationwide. An estimate of the percent cover of emergent vegetation was the only success criterion specified in the majority of permits. About 60% of the mitigation wetlands were judged as meeting their originally defined success criteria, some after more than 10 years. The permit process appears to have resulted in a net gain of almost 0.05 ha of wetlands per mitigation project. However, due to the replacement of emergent, scrub-shrub, and forested wetlands with open water ponds or uplands, mitigation practices probably led to a net loss of vegetated wetlands.
对宾夕法尼亚州中部的23份第404条许可(涵盖1至14年的湿地年龄范围)进行了审查,以确定获批的缓解湿地类型、场地建设方式以及用于评估的成功标准。大多数许可允许采用非同类缓解方式,即通过植被或水文地貌类别进行缓解。缓解过程导致了从以木本物种为主的受影响湿地向植被较少的缓解湿地的转变,这一趋势似乎正在全国范围内出现。在大多数许可中,唯一规定的成功标准是对挺水植被覆盖百分比的估计。约60%的缓解湿地被判定符合其最初定义的成功标准,有些是在十多年后达到的。许可程序似乎使每个缓解项目的湿地净增加量接近0.05公顷。然而,由于用开阔水塘或高地取代了挺水、灌丛和森林湿地,缓解措施可能导致了植被湿地的净损失。