Adair J G
University of Manitoba, Canada.
Can Psychol. 2001 Feb;42(1):25-37. doi: 10.1037/h0086877.
The implementation over the past year within Canadian universities of the new Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS) ushers in a new era in the oversight of the ethics of psychological research in Canada. Although these new policies apply to all human research, our interest in how they apply to psychology, primarily to deception, undergraduate subject pools, and other continuing concerns. Why have the granting agencies decided that government regulation of research ethics is necessary and what is the relationship between federal regulations and discipline codes? The history of CPA's involvement in protecting psychology's interests in the final revisions to the TCPS is recounted. In spite of what has been achieved, many psychologists feel that the TCPS has created new concerns for the discipline. Although there is the potential for startup problems, it is in our collective and individual best interests to make the policy work, thereby ensuring that escalation of government regulation or legislation will not be pursued.
过去一年,加拿大各大学实施了新的三理事会政策声明:涉及人类的研究的道德行为(TCPS),这开启了加拿大心理学研究伦理监督的新时代。尽管这些新政策适用于所有人类研究,但我们关注它们如何适用于心理学,主要涉及欺骗、本科受试者库以及其他持续存在的问题。资助机构为何认定政府对研究伦理进行监管是必要的,联邦法规与学科规范之间的关系是怎样的?文中讲述了加拿大心理学会(CPA)参与TCPS最终修订以保护心理学界利益的历史。尽管已经取得了一些成果,但许多心理学家认为TCPS给该学科带来了新的问题。虽然可能会出现启动阶段的问题,但让该政策发挥作用符合我们的集体和个人最大利益,从而确保不会寻求政府监管或立法的升级。