Lanzarini Luca, Fontana Alessandra, Lucca Elena, Campana Carlo, Klersy Catherine
Department of Cardiology, IRCCS-Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Am Heart J. 2002 Dec;144(6):1087-94. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.126350.
Noninvasive estimation of pulmonary artery systolic and diastolic pressures usually requires the investigation of both tricuspid and pulmonary regurgitant jets and an estimate of right atrial pressure. A new, noninvasive method to obtain pulmonary diastolic pressure (based on the hemodynamic demonstration that right ventricular systolic pressure and pulmonary artery diastolic pressure are equal at the time of pulmonary valve opening) from the analysis of tricuspid regurgitation alone has been described in a small cohort of patients. We sought to verify the accuracy of this method in a large population of patients with heart failure.
An estimate of pulmonary artery diastolic pressure was obtained by transposing the pulmonary opening time (from the onset of the R wave on the electrocardiographic tracing to the beginning of pulmonic forward flow on Doppler examination) onto the tricuspid regurgitant velocity curve and calculating the pulmonary artery diastolic pressure value as the pressure gradient between the right ventricle and right atrium at this time. The study group included 86 consecutive patients (64 men, aged 52 +/- 11 years) with heart failure (New York Heart Association class > or =II, 94%) who were in stable clinical condition with a chiefly idiopathic (57%), ischemic (24%), or other form (13%) of dilated cardiomyopathy. Noninvasive, right-sided pressures were compared with invasive measurements obtained during right heart catheterization performed within 24 hours. The Bland and Altman graphic method was used together with the calculation of the Lin concordance correlation coefficient and its 95% CI to assess the agreement between hemodynamic and echocardiographic measurements.
Catheter-derived pulmonary artery systolic pressure ranged from 8 to 119 mm Hg (mean 42 +/- 21 mm Hg), pulmonary artery diastolic pressure from 1 to 59 mm Hg (mean 20 +/- 11 mm Hg), and right atrial pressure from -5 to 20 mm Hg (mean 6 +/- 5 mm Hg). Tricuspid regurgitation was detected in 75 of 86 patients (87%). Pulmonary artery systolic pressure ranged from 13 to 110 mm Hg (mean 44 +/- 21 mm Hg); the pressure gradient between the right ventricle and right atrium at time t of the pulmonary valve opening on the tricuspid regurgitation velocity curve was measurable in 70 of 75 (93%) cases and ranged from 3.5 to 64 mm Hg (mean 22 +/- 11 mm Hg). Good agreement was observed not only for pulmonary artery systolic pressure but also for pulmonary artery diastolic pressure, based on the analysis of the tricuspid regurgitation velocity jet, with a slight difference between measurements (-1.8 and 0.1, respectively), no evident pattern of point scattering, and a high concordance correlation coefficient that was elicited by the virtually total overlapping of lines on the graph. Overall results were not significantly different whether patients with depressed right ventricular function (right ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%), with a tricuspid regurgitation grade > or =2 and atrial fibrillation were included in the analysis.
The narrow paired difference for the estimate of pulmonary artery systolic pressure and the even better difference for pulmonary artery diastolic pressure using the tricuspid regurgitation velocity curve analysis indicates that this new method reliably estimates invasive right-sided pressures over a wide range of pressure values in patients with heart failure. The overall good correlation with invasive values indicates that Doppler examination of tricuspid regurgitation alone may provide a simple and comprehensive new method for the noninvasive evaluation of right ventricular and pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with heart failure.
肺动脉收缩压和舒张压的无创估计通常需要同时研究三尖瓣反流和肺动脉反流束,并估计右心房压力。在一小群患者中描述了一种新的无创方法,可仅通过分析三尖瓣反流来获得肺动脉舒张压(基于血流动力学证明,在肺动脉瓣开放时右心室收缩压与肺动脉舒张压相等)。我们试图在大量心力衰竭患者中验证该方法的准确性。
通过将肺动脉开放时间(从心电图R波起始点到多普勒检查时肺动脉前向血流开始)转换到三尖瓣反流速度曲线上,并计算此时右心室与右心房之间的压力梯度作为肺动脉舒张压值,来获得肺动脉舒张压的估计值。研究组包括86例连续的心力衰竭患者(64例男性,年龄52±11岁)(纽约心脏协会心功能分级≥II级,占94%),临床病情稳定,主要为特发性(57%)、缺血性(24%)或其他形式(13%)的扩张型心肌病。将无创的右侧压力与在24小时内进行右心导管检查时获得的有创测量值进行比较。采用Bland和Altman图形法,并计算Lin一致性相关系数及其95%可信区间,以评估血流动力学测量值与超声心动图测量值之间的一致性。
导管测量的肺动脉收缩压范围为8至119 mmHg(平均42±21 mmHg),肺动脉舒张压范围为1至59 mmHg(平均20±11 mmHg),右心房压力范围为 -5至20 mmHg(平均6±5 mmHg)。86例患者中有75例(87%)检测到三尖瓣反流。肺动脉收缩压范围为13至110 mmHg(平均44±21 mmHg);在三尖瓣反流速度曲线上肺动脉瓣开放时间t时右心室与右心房之间的压力梯度在75例中的70例(93%)中可测量,范围为3.5至64 mmHg(平均22±11 mmHg)。基于对三尖瓣反流速度束的分析,不仅观察到肺动脉收缩压,而且观察到肺动脉舒张压的良好一致性,测量值之间存在轻微差异(分别为 -1.8和0.1),没有明显的点散射模式,并且通过图上几乎完全重叠的线得出了高一致性相关系数。无论分析中是否纳入右心室功能减退(右心室射血分数≤35%)、三尖瓣反流分级≥2级和心房颤动的患者,总体结果均无显著差异。
使用三尖瓣反流速度曲线分析估计肺动脉收缩压时的配对差异较小,而估计肺动脉舒张压时的差异甚至更小,这表明这种新方法在心力衰竭患者的广泛压力值范围内可靠地估计有创右侧压力。与有创值的总体良好相关性表明,仅对三尖瓣反流进行多普勒检查可能为心力衰竭患者的右心室和肺血流动力学无创评估提供一种简单而全面的新方法。