• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全骶骨切除术后重建腰骶椎的生物力学评估

Biomechanical evaluation of reconstructed lumbosacral spine after total sacrectomy.

作者信息

Murakami Hideki, Kawahara Norio, Tomita Katsuro, Sakamoto Jiro, Oda Juhachi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2002;7(6):658-64. doi: 10.1007/s007760200117.

DOI:10.1007/s007760200117
PMID:12486469
Abstract

When a sacral tumor involves the first sacral vertebra, total sacrectomy is necessary. It is mandatory to reconstruct the continuity between the spine and the pelvis after total sacrectomy. In this study, strain and stress on the instruments and the bones were evaluated for two reconstruction methods: a modified Galveston reconstruction (MGR) and a triangular frame reconstruction (TFR). Compressive loading tests were performed using polyurethane vertebral models, and a finite element model of a lumbar spine and pelvis was constructed. Then three-dimensional MGR and TFR models were reconstructed, and finite element analysis was performed to account for the stress on the bones and instruments. With MGR, excessive stress was concentrated at the spinal rod, and there was a strong possibility that the rod between the spine and the pelvis might fail. Although there was no stress concentration on the instruments with TFR, excessive stress on the iliac bone around the sacral rod was more than the yielding stress of the iliac bone. Such stress may cause loosening of the sacral rod from the iliac bone. If the patient were to stand or sit immediately after MGR or TFR, instrumentation failure or loosening might occur.

摘要

当骶骨肿瘤累及第一骶椎时,全骶骨切除术是必要的。全骶骨切除术后重建脊柱与骨盆之间的连续性是必须的。在本研究中,针对两种重建方法评估了器械和骨骼上的应变与应力:改良加尔维斯顿重建法(MGR)和三角框架重建法(TFR)。使用聚氨酯椎体模型进行压缩载荷试验,并构建腰椎和骨盆的有限元模型。然后重建三维MGR和TFR模型,并进行有限元分析以计算骨骼和器械上的应力。采用MGR时,过大的应力集中在脊柱棒上,脊柱与骨盆之间的棒很有可能失效。虽然TFR在器械上没有应力集中,但骶骨棒周围髂骨上的过大应力超过了髂骨的屈服应力。这种应力可能导致骶骨棒从髂骨上松动。如果患者在MGR或TFR后立即站立或坐下,可能会发生器械失效或松动。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical evaluation of reconstructed lumbosacral spine after total sacrectomy.全骶骨切除术后重建腰骶椎的生物力学评估
J Orthop Sci. 2002;7(6):658-64. doi: 10.1007/s007760200117.
2
Reconstruction after total sacrectomy using a new instrumentation technique: a biomechanical comparison.使用一种新的器械技术进行全骶骨切除术后的重建:生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 15;28(14):1567-72.
3
Comprehensive biomechanical analysis of three reconstruction techniques following total sacrectomy: an in vitro human cadaveric model.全骶骨切除术后三种重建技术的综合生物力学分析:体外人体尸体模型
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Nov;27(5):570-577. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.SPINE161128. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
4
Biomechanical comparison of spinopelvic reconstruction techniques in the setting of total sacrectomy.在全骶骨切除术中对脊柱骨盆重建技术的生物力学比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Dec 15;37(26):E1622-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827619d3.
5
Comparison of four reconstruction methods after total sacrectomy: a finite element study.全骶骨切除术后四种重建方法的比较:一项有限元研究
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012 Oct;27(8):771-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
6
Total sacrectomy and reconstruction for sacral tumors.骶骨肿瘤的全骶骨切除术及重建术
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15):E296-301. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083230.12704.E3.
7
Biomechanical comparison of a 3D-printed sacrum prosthesis versus rod-screw systems for reconstruction after total sacrectomy: A finite element analysis.3D打印骶骨假体与棒-螺钉系统在全骶骨切除术后重建中的生物力学比较:有限元分析
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 Dec;70:203-208. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.10.019. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
8
The biomechanical effect of lumbopelvic distance reduction on reconstruction after total sacrectomy: a comparative finite element analysis of four techniques.全骶骨切除术后重建中腰骨盆距离减小的生物力学效应:四种技术的比较有限元分析。
Spine J. 2024 Oct;24(10):1981-1992. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.04.024. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
9
Long-term clinical outcome of sacral chondrosarcoma treated by total en bloc sacrectomy and reconstruction of lumbosacral and pelvic ring using intraoperative extracorporeal irradiated autologous tumor-bearing sacrum: a case report with 10 years follow-up.采用术中体外放射灭活自体含肿瘤骶骨进行全块切除骶骨肿瘤切除和腰骶骨盆环重建治疗骶骨软骨肉瘤的长期临床结果:10 年随访的 1 例报告
Spine J. 2014 May 1;14(5):e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.057. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
10
Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy.部分骶骨切除术后腰骶部重建的有限元分析
Med Sci Monit. 2014 May 30;20:889-93. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890134.

引用本文的文献

1
Partial sacrectomy with en bloc tumor resection without instrumentation. What level is safe?不使用内固定器械进行整块肿瘤切除的部分骶骨切除术。安全的切除平面是什么?
Brain Spine. 2025 Mar 27;5:104246. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104246. eCollection 2025.
2
Sacral Prosthesis Substitution as a System of Spinopelvic Reconstruction After Total Sacrectomy: Assessment Using the Finite Element Method.全骶骨切除术后骶骨假体置换作为一种脊柱骨盆重建系统:采用有限元法进行评估
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Jun;16(3):512-520. doi: 10.14444/8258. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
What Are the Conditional Survival and Functional Outcomes After Surgical Treatment of 115 Patients With Sacral Chordoma?
115例骶骨脊索瘤患者接受手术治疗后的条件生存和功能结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):620-630. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4773-8.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of a biomimetic spinal construct.一种仿生脊柱植入物的生物力学评估
J Exp Orthop. 2014 Dec;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40634-014-0003-z. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
5
Biomechanical evaluation of supplemental percutaneous lumbo-sacro-iliac screws for spinopelvic fixation following total sacrectomy.全骶骨切除术后用于脊柱骨盆固定的经皮补充腰骶髂螺钉的生物力学评估
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 May;28(4):E181-5. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000241.
6
Radiographic study of iliac screw passages.髂骨螺钉通道的影像学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 May 23;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-40.
7
The strain at bone-implant interface determines the effect of spinopelvic reconstruction following total sacrectomy: a strain gauge analysis in various spinopelvic constructs.骨-植入物界面的应变决定了全骶骨切除术后脊柱骨盆重建的效果:不同脊柱骨盆重建中的应变片分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 14;9(1):e85298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085298. eCollection 2014.
8
Femur performed better than tibia in autologous transplantation during hemipelvis reconstruction.在半骨盆重建的自体移植中,股骨的表现优于胫骨。
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan 4;12:1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-1.
9
Experience with wound complications after surgery for sacral tumors.骶骨肿瘤手术后的伤口并发症经验。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Sep;22(9):2069-76. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2765-x. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
10
Emisacrectomy, experience in 11 cases.骶骨部分切除术,11例经验
Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):109-14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0993-x. Epub 2009 May 26.