Mayer Kristen L, Stone Martin J
Department of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405-0001, USA.
Proteins. 2003 Feb 1;50(2):184-91. doi: 10.1002/prot.10238.
The eotaxin group chemokines (eotaxin, eotaxin-2, and eotaxin-3) share only 35-41% sequence identity but are all agonists for the receptor CCR3. Here we present a detailed comparison between the backbone dynamics of these three chemokines. The dynamics of eotaxin-2 were determined from 15N NMR relaxation data and compared to those obtained previously for eotaxin and eotaxin-3. For all three chemokines, the majority of residues in the first two beta-strands and the alpha-helix show highly restricted motions on the subnanosecond time scale but there is dramatically higher flexibility in the N- and C-terminal regions and also substantial mobility for residues in the N-loop region and the third beta-strand. The latter two regions form a groove on the chemokine surface that is the likely binding site for the N-terminal region of the receptor. Taken together, the available data suggest a model in which conformational rearrangements of both the chemokine and the receptor are likely to occur during binding and receptor activation.
嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子家族趋化因子(嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子、嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-2和嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3)的序列同一性仅为35-41%,但均为受体CCR3的激动剂。在此,我们对这三种趋化因子的主链动力学进行了详细比较。嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-2的动力学由15N NMR弛豫数据确定,并与先前获得的嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子和嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3的动力学进行比较。对于所有三种趋化因子,前两条β链和α螺旋中的大多数残基在亚纳秒时间尺度上表现出高度受限的运动,但N端和C端区域的灵活性显著更高,N环区域和第三条β链中的残基也具有相当大的流动性。后两个区域在趋化因子表面形成一个凹槽,这可能是受体N端区域的结合位点。综合现有数据表明,在结合和受体激活过程中,趋化因子和受体可能都会发生构象重排。