Grønholdt Marie-Louise Moes
Department of Vascular Surgery RK, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2002 Aug;12(3):421-35. doi: 10.1016/s1052-5149(02)00015-1.
More studies on the natural history of carotid artery plaques are needed to predict more reliably which plaque types or features are the most dangerous (see Table 2). Studies on carotid and coronary endarterectomy specimens indicate a dynamic process of rupture, thrombus formation, healing, and remodeling of the plaque. A plaque from a symptomatic patient may not show any signs of plaque rupture if the plaque has healed or evolved since the debut of symptoms. Selection of high-risk symptomatic patients with carotid atherosclerosis for medical or surgical treatment requires reliable, noninvasive, and cost-effective imaging methods. B-mode ultrasonography can be used for detection of early (IMT) as well as late (plaque morphology) atherosclerotic disease. Plaque morphology evaluation on spiral CT imaging is only for research and not yet for clinical use. Asymptomatic patients with carotid atherosclerosis hardly benefit from surgical treatment, as the minimal decrease in ischemic stroke risk is almost equal to the risk of perioperative stroke or death. A high degree of carotid stenosis measured using conventional angiography is an accepted risk factor for stroke but does not identify all vulnerable plaques. Echolucency on ultrasound B-mode imaging can be included as an important parameter in this risk stratification, as it appears to predict rupture-prone, lipid-rich plaques in the mild to severely stenotic carotid artery of a symptomatic patient. The subjective evaluation of plaque morphology on B-mode ultrasound should be complemented or substituted with objective evaluation such as videodensitometric analysis. This method is commercially available and is a relatively cheap and investigator-independent solution, but more studies are required to determine the exact contribution of echolucency to stroke risk. Furthermore, the evaluation of plaque morphology using ultrasound B-mode is still subject to large variations and observer-dependence, limiting its clinical use. In contrast, carotid IMT measurements are reliable to monitor progression and regression of early carotid disease as well as the impact of interventions. This method, however, suffers when used in severely diseased vessels where the boundaries of the IMT complex are hard to distinguish in all segments of the artery. Spiral CT imaging is a preliminary test for plaque characterization, as it primarily identifies calcification but not the more relevant lipid component. Moreover, it is time and resource demanding and involves use of both contrast and radiation, increasing the risk of allergic events and cancer. Standardization and continuous quality control are important, as are consensus agreements on how to quantify lesions (especially IMT), calibrate and standardize B-mode images and outline the plaque, and analyze data. The development of imaging methods for atherosclerotic research is currently fast and promising. This progress is most necessary, considering the very high demands for surrogate endpoints and risk markers in clinical intervention studies. Whether ultrasonic plaque characterization can be implemented in broad general clinical practice, for example, in screening of individuals at high risk of developing atherosclerosis and ischemic events, has to be based upon data from large prospective studies with long-term follow-up. IMT is already used in population screening, as in the ARIC study [9,101].
需要开展更多关于颈动脉斑块自然史的研究,以便更可靠地预测哪些斑块类型或特征最为危险(见表2)。对颈动脉和冠状动脉内膜切除术标本的研究表明,斑块存在破裂、血栓形成、愈合及重塑的动态过程。如果斑块自症状首次出现后已经愈合或演变,有症状患者的斑块可能不会显示任何斑块破裂迹象。选择患有颈动脉粥样硬化的高危有症状患者进行药物或手术治疗,需要可靠、无创且经济有效的成像方法。B型超声可用于检测早期(内膜中层厚度)以及晚期(斑块形态)动脉粥样硬化疾病。螺旋CT成像的斑块形态评估仅用于研究,尚未用于临床。患有颈动脉粥样硬化的无症状患者几乎无法从手术治疗中获益,因为缺血性卒中风险的最小降低几乎等同于围手术期卒中或死亡风险。使用传统血管造影测量的高度颈动脉狭窄是公认的卒中危险因素,但无法识别所有易损斑块。超声B型成像的回声特性可作为该风险分层的一个重要参数,因为它似乎能预测有症状患者轻度至重度狭窄颈动脉中易破裂、富含脂质的斑块。B型超声对斑块形态的主观评估应以客观评估(如视频密度分析)作为补充或替代。该方法有商业产品,相对便宜且不依赖研究人员,但需要更多研究来确定回声特性对卒中风险的确切影响。此外,使用超声B型评估斑块形态仍存在较大差异且依赖观察者,限制了其临床应用。相比之下,颈动脉内膜中层厚度测量对于监测早期颈动脉疾病的进展和逆转以及干预效果是可靠的。然而,在严重病变血管中使用该方法时会遇到问题,因为在动脉的所有节段中内膜中层厚度复合体的边界很难区分。螺旋CT成像对于斑块特征描述是一项初步检查,因为它主要识别钙化,而非更相关的脂质成分。此外,它需要时间和资源,且涉及使用造影剂和辐射,增加了过敏事件和癌症风险。标准化和持续质量控制很重要,就如何量化病变(尤其是内膜中层厚度)、校准和标准化B型图像并勾勒斑块以及分析数据达成共识也很重要。目前,动脉粥样硬化研究成像方法的发展迅速且前景广阔。考虑到临床干预研究对替代终点和风险标志物的极高要求,这一进展非常必要。例如,超声斑块特征描述能否在广泛的普通临床实践中实施,如筛查有动脉粥样硬化和缺血事件高风险的个体,必须基于长期随访的大型前瞻性研究数据。内膜中层厚度已用于人群筛查,如ARIC研究[9,101]。