Donahue James M, Mullen John T, Tanabe Kenneth K
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cox 626, 100 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114-2696, USA.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2002 Jul;11(3):661-80. doi: 10.1016/s1055-3207(02)00025-x.
Although the concept of using viruses as antineoplastic agents dates back nearly a century, recent advances in the fields of molecular biology, genetics, and virology have enabled investigators to engineer viruses with greater potency and tumor specificity. Further enhancements involve arming these viruses with therapeutic transgenes, and combining the traditional modalities of chemotherapy and radiation therapy with oncolytic viral therapy in hopes of reducing the chance of developing resistant tumor cell clones. Another means of augmenting the antineoplastic effect of these viruses involves modulating the immune response to minimize antiviral immunity, while at the same time maximizing antitumor immunity. A better understanding of mechanisms that viruses use to overcome cellular defenses to achieve robust replication within the cell will lead to development of oncolytic viruses with better tumor specificity and reduced toxicity. Initial clinical studies have shown that oncolytic viral therapy for metastatic disease is safe and well tolerated. In addition, using similar genetic modification strategies, these viruses have demonstrated antineoplastic effects in humans similar to those seen in preclinical animal models.
尽管将病毒用作抗肿瘤药物的概念可以追溯到近一个世纪前,但分子生物学、遗传学和病毒学领域的最新进展使研究人员能够设计出具有更高效力和肿瘤特异性的病毒。进一步的改进包括为这些病毒配备治疗性转基因,并将传统的化疗和放疗方式与溶瘤病毒疗法相结合,以期减少产生耐药肿瘤细胞克隆的可能性。增强这些病毒抗肿瘤作用的另一种方法是调节免疫反应,以尽量减少抗病毒免疫,同时最大限度地提高抗肿瘤免疫。更好地理解病毒用于克服细胞防御以在细胞内实现强劲复制的机制,将有助于开发出具有更好肿瘤特异性和更低毒性的溶瘤病毒。初步临床研究表明,溶瘤病毒疗法治疗转移性疾病是安全的,且耐受性良好。此外,使用类似的基因改造策略,这些病毒在人类身上也显示出与临床前动物模型中相似的抗肿瘤效果。