Suppr超能文献

水果和蔬菜评估:两种新型简短工具及一份食物频率问卷的性能

Fruit and vegetable assessment: performance of 2 new short instruments and a food frequency questionnaire.

作者信息

Thompson Frances E, Subar Amy F, Smith Albert F, Midthune Douglas, Radimer Kathy L, Kahle Lisa L, Kipnis Victor

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344, USA.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Dec;102(12):1764-72. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90379-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of 2 new short assessment instruments and a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to measure intake of fruit and vegetables. The "All-Day" screener asks frequency and portion size questions about 9 food items. The "By-Meal" screener is similar, except that it asks about 2 of those 9 food items in terms of mealtime.

DESIGN

Survey participants completed 4 telephone-administered 24-hour dietary recalls over 1 year, a self-administered FFQ 1 to 2 months later, and 1 of 2 self-administered screeners after an additional 7 months.

SUBJECTS/SETTING: Participating were 202 men and 260 women aged 20 to 70 years living throughout the United States.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Fruit and vegetable intakes measured by each screener and the FFQ were compared with true usual intake based on a measurement error model with 24-hour dietary recalls as the reference instrument.

RESULTS

Estimates of median daily servings of fruit and vegetables were as follows: For men: True intake (5.8) vs All-Day screener (5.0), By-Meal screener (5.5), and FFQ (6.6); for women: true intake (4.2) vs All-Day screener (5.0), By-Meal screener (5.4), and FFQ (6.2). Estimated correlations between the test instruments and true intake were as follows: For men: All-Day screener (0.66), By-Meal screener (0.67), FFQ (0.68); for women: All-Day screener (0.51), By-Meal screener (0.53), and FFQ (0.54).

APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Both screeners might be useful to estimate median intakes of fruit and vegetable servings in US populations, but they might be less useful in accurately ranking individuals. More research is needed before using the screeners in ethnic or low-literacy populations.

摘要

目的

评估两种新的简短评估工具和一份食物频率问卷(FFQ)测量水果和蔬菜摄入量的能力。“全天”筛查工具询问9种食物的食用频率和份量问题。“按餐”筛查工具与之类似,只是它按用餐时间询问这9种食物中的2种。

设计

调查参与者在1年时间内通过电话完成4次24小时饮食回顾,1至2个月后完成一份自填式FFQ,再过7个月后完成两种自填式筛查工具中的一种。

受试者/研究背景:参与研究的是202名年龄在20至70岁之间、居住在美国各地的男性和260名女性。

统计分析

以24小时饮食回顾作为参考工具,基于测量误差模型,将每种筛查工具和FFQ测量的水果和蔬菜摄入量与真实的通常摄入量进行比较。

结果

水果和蔬菜每日摄入量中位数的估计值如下:男性:真实摄入量(5.8),“全天”筛查工具(5.0),“按餐”筛查工具(5.5),FFQ(6.6);女性:真实摄入量(4.2),“全天”筛查工具(5.0),“按餐”筛查工具(5.4),FFQ(6.2)。测试工具与真实摄入量之间的估计相关性如下:男性:“全天”筛查工具(0.66),“按餐”筛查工具(0.67),FFQ(0.68);女性:“全天”筛查工具(0.51),“按餐”筛查工具(0.53),FFQ(0.54)。

应用/结论:两种筛查工具可能有助于估计美国人群中水果和蔬菜份量的摄入量中位数,但在准确对个体进行排名方面可能不太有用。在将筛查工具用于少数民族或低文化程度人群之前,还需要更多的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验