• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水果和蔬菜评估:两种新型简短工具及一份食物频率问卷的性能

Fruit and vegetable assessment: performance of 2 new short instruments and a food frequency questionnaire.

作者信息

Thompson Frances E, Subar Amy F, Smith Albert F, Midthune Douglas, Radimer Kathy L, Kahle Lisa L, Kipnis Victor

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344, USA.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Dec;102(12):1764-72. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90379-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90379-2
PMID:12487538
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of 2 new short assessment instruments and a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to measure intake of fruit and vegetables. The "All-Day" screener asks frequency and portion size questions about 9 food items. The "By-Meal" screener is similar, except that it asks about 2 of those 9 food items in terms of mealtime.

DESIGN

Survey participants completed 4 telephone-administered 24-hour dietary recalls over 1 year, a self-administered FFQ 1 to 2 months later, and 1 of 2 self-administered screeners after an additional 7 months.

SUBJECTS/SETTING: Participating were 202 men and 260 women aged 20 to 70 years living throughout the United States.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Fruit and vegetable intakes measured by each screener and the FFQ were compared with true usual intake based on a measurement error model with 24-hour dietary recalls as the reference instrument.

RESULTS

Estimates of median daily servings of fruit and vegetables were as follows: For men: True intake (5.8) vs All-Day screener (5.0), By-Meal screener (5.5), and FFQ (6.6); for women: true intake (4.2) vs All-Day screener (5.0), By-Meal screener (5.4), and FFQ (6.2). Estimated correlations between the test instruments and true intake were as follows: For men: All-Day screener (0.66), By-Meal screener (0.67), FFQ (0.68); for women: All-Day screener (0.51), By-Meal screener (0.53), and FFQ (0.54).

APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Both screeners might be useful to estimate median intakes of fruit and vegetable servings in US populations, but they might be less useful in accurately ranking individuals. More research is needed before using the screeners in ethnic or low-literacy populations.

摘要

目的

评估两种新的简短评估工具和一份食物频率问卷(FFQ)测量水果和蔬菜摄入量的能力。“全天”筛查工具询问9种食物的食用频率和份量问题。“按餐”筛查工具与之类似,只是它按用餐时间询问这9种食物中的2种。

设计

调查参与者在1年时间内通过电话完成4次24小时饮食回顾,1至2个月后完成一份自填式FFQ,再过7个月后完成两种自填式筛查工具中的一种。

受试者/研究背景:参与研究的是202名年龄在20至70岁之间、居住在美国各地的男性和260名女性。

统计分析

以24小时饮食回顾作为参考工具,基于测量误差模型,将每种筛查工具和FFQ测量的水果和蔬菜摄入量与真实的通常摄入量进行比较。

结果

水果和蔬菜每日摄入量中位数的估计值如下:男性:真实摄入量(5.8),“全天”筛查工具(5.0),“按餐”筛查工具(5.5),FFQ(6.6);女性:真实摄入量(4.2),“全天”筛查工具(5.0),“按餐”筛查工具(5.4),FFQ(6.2)。测试工具与真实摄入量之间的估计相关性如下:男性:“全天”筛查工具(0.66),“按餐”筛查工具(0.67),FFQ(0.68);女性:“全天”筛查工具(0.51),“按餐”筛查工具(0.53),FFQ(0.54)。

应用/结论:两种筛查工具可能有助于估计美国人群中水果和蔬菜份量的摄入量中位数,但在准确对个体进行排名方面可能不太有用。在将筛查工具用于少数民族或低文化程度人群之前,还需要更多的研究。

相似文献

1
Fruit and vegetable assessment: performance of 2 new short instruments and a food frequency questionnaire.水果和蔬菜评估:两种新型简短工具及一份食物频率问卷的性能
J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Dec;102(12):1764-72. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90379-2.
2
Evaluation of 2 brief instruments and a food-frequency questionnaire to estimate daily number of servings of fruit and vegetables.评估两种简易工具和一份食物频率问卷以估算每日水果和蔬菜的食用份数。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Jun;71(6):1503-10. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1503.
3
Performance of a short tool to assess dietary intakes of fruits and vegetables, percentage energy from fat and fibre.一种用于评估水果和蔬菜摄入量、脂肪和纤维能量百分比的简短工具的性能。
Public Health Nutr. 2004 Dec;7(8):1097-105. doi: 10.1079/PHN2004642.
4
Evaluation of three short dietary instruments to assess fruit and vegetable intake: the National Cancer Institute's food attitudes and behaviors survey.三种短式膳食工具评估水果和蔬菜摄入量的评估:美国国家癌症研究所的食物态度和行为调查。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Oct;112(10):1570-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.06.002.
5
Comparison of single questions and brief questionnaire with longer validated food frequency questionnaire to assess adequate fruit and vegetable intake.将单个问题及简短问卷与经过验证的较长食物频率问卷进行比较,以评估水果和蔬菜的充足摄入量。
Nutrition. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(7-8):941-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
6
Development and evaluation of a short instrument to estimate usual dietary intake of percentage energy from fat.一种用于估计脂肪能量占日常饮食摄入量百分比的简短工具的开发与评估。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 May;107(5):760-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.02.006.
7
The effect of social desirability trait on self-reported dietary measures among multi-ethnic female health center employees.社会期望特质对多民族女性健康中心员工自我报告饮食测量的影响。
Ann Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;11(6):417-27. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00212-5.
8
Validation of a brief diet survey instrument among medical students.医学生中一种简短饮食调查问卷工具的验证
J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 May;105(5):802-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.02.003.
9
Vegetable and fruit food frequency questionnaire serves as a proxy for quantified intake.蔬菜和水果食物频率问卷可作为定量摄入量的替代指标。
Can J Public Health. 2006 Jul-Aug;97(4):286-90. doi: 10.1007/BF03405605.
10
Adjustment Factors Can Improve Estimates of Food Group Intake Assessed Using a Short Dietary Assessment Instrument.调整因素可以改善使用短期饮食评估工具评估的食物组摄入量的估计。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Oct;118(10):1864-1873. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Pittsburgh sleep quality index-2 (PSQI-2): the validity of a two-item sleep quality screener in Brazilian adults.匹兹堡睡眠质量指数-2(PSQI-2):一项针对巴西成年人的两项睡眠质量筛查工具的有效性
Sleep Breath. 2025 Jul 10;29(4):238. doi: 10.1007/s11325-025-03408-x.
2
Geographical Fast-food Restaurant Density, Workplace Eating Behaviors, and Obesity Among Firefighters.消防员所处地区的快餐店密度、工作场所饮食行为与肥胖情况
Saf Health Work. 2025 Jun;16(2):220-227. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2025.03.003. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
3
Dietary Quality and Intake of Cancer Caregivers: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies and Recommendations for Future Research.
癌症护理者的饮食质量与摄入量:定量研究的系统评价及对未来研究的建议
Cancer Med. 2025 Feb;14(3):e70668. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70668.
4
A Compelling Health Promoting Primary Care Clinic Using a Settings-Based Approach: A Demonstration Project.一个采用基于环境的方法的具有说服力的促进健康的初级保健诊所:一个示范项目。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Dec 1:15598276241303728. doi: 10.1177/15598276241303728.
5
Who's Behind the Wheel? Work and Health Backgrounds of New Transit Bus Operators.谁在掌控方向盘?新公交司机的工作与健康背景
J Occup Environ Med. 2024 Dec 1;66(12):1022-1029. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003235. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
6
MALAMA: Cultivating Food Sovereignty through Backyard Aquaponics with Native Hawaiian Families.玛拉玛:与夏威夷原住民家庭一起通过后院鱼菜共生系统实现粮食主权
Genealogy (Basel). 2024 Sep;8(3). doi: 10.3390/genealogy8030101. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
7
Cook and Move for Your Life, an eHealth intervention for women with breast cancer.“为生命烹饪与运动”,一项针对乳腺癌女性的电子健康干预措施。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024 Jul 25;10(1):62. doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00662-2.
8
Assessing and Monitoring Nutrition Security in the United States: A Narrative Review of Current Measures and Instruments.评估和监测美国的营养安全:当前措施和工具的叙述性综述。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2024 Sep;13(3):639-667. doi: 10.1007/s13668-024-00547-7. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
9
Local Food System Approaches to Address Food and Nutrition Security among Low-Income Populations: A Systematic Review.本地食品系统方法在解决低收入人群的食物和营养安全问题中的应用:系统评价。
Adv Nutr. 2024 Apr;15(4):100156. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.100156. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
10
Food insecurity, fruit and vegetable consumption, and use of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in Appalachian Ohio.阿巴拉契亚俄亥俄州的食物不安全、水果和蔬菜消费以及补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的使用情况。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0295171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295171. eCollection 2024.