Fuller Crystal M, Ahern Jennifer, Vadnai Liza, Coffin Phillip O, Galea Sandro, Factor Stephanie H, Vlahov David
Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies, New York Academy of Medicine, NY, USA.
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2002 Nov-Dec;42(6 Suppl 2):S77-82. doi: 10.1331/1086-5802.42.0.s77.fuller.
To evaluate the New York State Expanded Syringe Access Demonstration Program (ESAP) through injection drug user (IDU) surveys, discarded needles and syringes studies, and pharmacy sales and experiences surveys.
Pre-post comparison.
In Harlem, New York City, risk surveys among street-recruited IDUs, needle/syringe street counts on 27 systematically sampled city blocks, and Harlem pharmacist reports of sales and experiences.
Number and types of IDU syringe sources, block mean counts of discarded needles and syringes, level of pharmacy nonprescription syringe sales (NPSS), and pharmacists' experiences.
Comparing 209 pre-ESAP with 396 post-ESAP IDUs, pharmacies as a primary syringe source increased: 3.4% to 5.3% (P < .001, and ever pharmacy use increased: 4.9% to 12.5% (P < .001), respectively. Compared with pre-ESAP IDUs, post-ESAP IDUs tended to be younger and more often black. Harlem pharmacy participation in ESAP increased considerably from March 1, 2001, to March 1, 2002, 49% to 79%, respectively. Among three Harlem pharmacies, there was a modest increase in NPSS; pharmacists reported no problems, and no discarded needles and syringes were observed in pharmacy areas. In the three pharmacies, the proportion of syringe sales that were NPSS was 46% (110 to 240 NPSS/month), 3% (25 to 90 NPSS/month), and 0%. The mean ratios of needles/syringes to background trash have not increased in Harlem since ESAP began.
To date, no evidence of harmful effects discarded needles/syringes, pharmacy altercations) resulting from ESAP were observed. While NPSS have increased in Harlem, pharmacy use among IDUs remains low. In Harlem, efforts are underway to increase ESAP awareness and reduce socioenvironmental barriers to ESAP.
通过对注射吸毒者(IDU)的调查、废弃针头和注射器研究以及药房销售与经验调查,评估纽约州扩大注射器获取示范项目(ESAP)。
前后对比。
纽约市哈莱姆区,对街头招募的注射吸毒者进行风险调查,对27个系统抽样的城市街区进行针头/注射器街头计数,以及哈莱姆区药剂师的销售与经验报告。
注射吸毒者注射器来源的数量和类型、街区废弃针头和注射器的平均计数、药房非处方注射器销售(NPSS)水平以及药剂师的经验。
将ESAP实施前的209名注射吸毒者与ESAP实施后的396名进行比较,药房作为主要注射器来源的比例有所增加:从3.4%增至5.3%(P <.001),曾使用过药房注射器的比例分别从4.9%增至12.5%(P <.001)。与ESAP实施前的注射吸毒者相比,ESAP实施后的注射吸毒者往往更年轻,且黑人比例更高。从2001年3月1日至2002年3月1日,哈莱姆区药房参与ESAP的比例大幅增加,分别从49%增至79%。在哈莱姆区的三家药房中,NPSS有适度增加;药剂师报告无问题,且在药房区域未观察到废弃针头和注射器。在这三家药房中,NPSS占注射器销售的比例分别为46%(每月110至240次NPSS)、3%(每月25至90次NPSS)和0%。自ESAP启动以来,哈莱姆区针头/注射器与背景垃圾的平均比率未增加。
迄今为止,未观察到ESAP导致有害影响(废弃针头/注射器、药房争吵)的证据。虽然哈莱姆区的NPSS有所增加,但注射吸毒者对药房的利用率仍然较低。在哈莱姆区,正在努力提高对ESAP的认识,并减少ESAP的社会环境障碍。