Hu J, Takatoku M, Sellers S E, Agricola B A, Metzger M E, Donahue R E, Dunbar C E
Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Hum Gene Ther. 2002 Nov 20;13(17):2041-50. doi: 10.1089/10430340260395893.
Adult marrow-derived cells have been shown to contribute to various nonhematologic tissues and, conversely, primitive cells isolated from nonhematopoietic tissues have been shown to reconstitute hematopoiesis. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been reported to be at least partially donor derived after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, and shown to contribute to neovascularization in murine ischemia models. However, it is unknown whether these EPCs are actually clonally derived from the same population of stem and progenitor cells that reconstitute hematopoiesis, or from another cell population found in the marrow or mobilized blood that is transferred during transplantation. To approach this question, we characterized circulating EPCs and also endothelial cells from large vessels harvested at autopsy from rhesus macaques previously transplanted with retrovirally transduced autologous CD34-enriched peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). Endothelial cells were grown in culture for 21-28 days and were characterized as CD31(+) CD14(-) via flow cytometry, as acLDL(+) UEA-1(+) via immunohistochemistry, and as Flk-1(+) by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Animals had stable vector marking in hematopoietic lineages of 2-15%. Neither cultured circulating EPCs collected in steady state (n = 3), nor endothelial cells grown from large vessels (n = 2), had detectable retroviral marking. EPCs were CD34(+) and could be mobilized into the circulation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Under ex vivo culture conditions, in which CD34(+) cells were optimized to transduce hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells, there was a marked depletion of EPCs. Transduction of EPCs was much more efficient under conditions supporting endothelial cell growth. Further elucidation of the origin and in vivo behavior of EPCs may be possible, using optimized transduction conditions and a vascular injury model.
已证明成体骨髓来源的细胞可分化为各种非血液学组织,反之,从非造血组织分离出的原始细胞也可重建造血功能。据报道,循环内皮祖细胞(EPCs)在异基因骨髓移植后至少部分来源于供体,并在小鼠缺血模型中显示出有助于新血管形成。然而,尚不清楚这些EPCs是否实际上克隆来源于重建造血功能的同一干细胞和祖细胞群体,还是来源于移植过程中转移的骨髓或动员血液中发现的另一种细胞群体。为了解决这个问题,我们对循环EPCs以及从恒河猴尸检获取的大血管内皮细胞进行了特征分析,这些恒河猴先前接受了逆转录病毒转导的自体富集CD34外周血干细胞(PBSCs)移植。内皮细胞在培养中生长21 - 28天,并通过流式细胞术鉴定为CD31(+) CD14(-),通过免疫组织化学鉴定为acLDL(+) UEA-1(+),通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)鉴定为Flk-1(+)。动物造血谱系中的载体标记稳定在2 - 15%。无论是稳态收集的培养循环EPCs(n = 3),还是从大血管生长的内皮细胞(n = 2),均未检测到逆转录病毒标记。EPCs为CD34(+),可通过粒细胞集落刺激因子动员进入循环。在优化用于转导造血祖细胞和干细胞的CD34(+)细胞的体外培养条件下,EPCs明显减少。在支持内皮细胞生长的条件下,EPCs的转导效率更高。使用优化的转导条件和血管损伤模型,可能进一步阐明EPCs的起源和体内行为。