Suppr超能文献

迷你腹腔镜辅助置入Tenckhoff导管:一种促进腹膜透析的改良技术。

Mini-laparoscopy-assisted placement of Tenckhoff catheters: an improved technique to facilitate peritoneal dialysis.

作者信息

Batey Charlotte A, Crane J Jason, Jenkins Michael A, Johnston Thomas D, Munch Larry C

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0084, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2002 Nov;16(9):681-4. doi: 10.1089/089277902761403041.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Despite its overall efficacy and patient satisfaction with it, peritoneal dialysis has a history of significant complications, which has contributed to the evolution in the technique from open laparotomy to minimally invasive placement of the catheters. Our goal was twofold: (1) to review our early experience with a technique of mini-laparoscopy-assisted (MLA) placement of dialysis catheters compared with open placement and (2) to demonstrate that urologists are able to provide a satisfactory procedure while concurrently developing and maintaining laparoscopic skills within a residency training program.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The charts of the first 14 consecutive patients who underwent MLA placement of Tenckhoff dialysis catheters by a single surgeon (LCM) from January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2001, were reviewed. Postoperative narcotic analgesia, length of hospital stay, operative times, days until cycling, and rates of leakage, infection, and malfunction necessitating removal of catheters were compared with the corresponding data from 12 consecutive patients who underwent traditional open placement during the same time period. A telephone survey was performed to corroborate and supplement the findings from the chart review.

RESULTS

Differences in complications necessitating catheter removal were not significant. The difference in the mean operative times of 41.7 minutes in the MLA group and 55.7 minutes for open placement was statistically significant. Postoperatively, the MLA group used less narcotic analgesia, had shorter hospital stays, and returned earlier to usual activities. The incidence of leakage after catheter placement was greater in the open group, although this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The MLA technique of dialysis catheter placement appears to have similar or greater efficacy than the open technique. It is a viable teaching procedure, and with reusable 3-mm ports and shorter operative times, it is cost efficient as well.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管腹膜透析具有总体疗效且患者对其满意度较高,但它存在严重并发症的历史,这促使该技术从开放式剖腹手术演变为导管的微创置入。我们的目标有两个:(1)回顾我们在微型腹腔镜辅助(MLA)置入透析导管技术方面与开放式置入相比的早期经验;(2)证明泌尿外科医生能够在住院医师培训项目中开展并维持腹腔镜技术的同时提供令人满意的手术。

患者与方法

回顾了2000年1月1日至2001年3月31日期间由单一外科医生(LCM)对连续14例患者进行Tenckhoff透析导管MLA置入的病历。将术后麻醉镇痛、住院时间、手术时间、开始透析的天数以及渗漏、感染和因故障需拔除导管的发生率与同期连续12例接受传统开放式置入患者的相应数据进行比较。进行了电话调查以证实和补充病历审查的结果。

结果

因并发症需拔除导管的差异无统计学意义。MLA组平均手术时间为41.7分钟,开放式置入组为55.7分钟,差异有统计学意义。术后,MLA组使用的麻醉镇痛较少,住院时间较短,恢复日常活动较早。开放式组导管置入后渗漏的发生率较高,尽管这一差异无统计学意义。

结论

透析导管置入的MLA技术似乎与开放式技术具有相似或更高的疗效。它是一种可行的教学手术,并且由于使用可重复使用的3毫米端口和较短的手术时间,成本效益也较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验