Itoh Masahiro, Fukuoka Yoshiyuki, Endo Masako, Kagawa Harumi, Araki Haruo, Nishi Katsuhide
Kumamoto University College of Medical Science.
J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2002 Sep;21(5):239-45. doi: 10.2114/jpa.21.239.
To evaluate the difference of ventilatory and gas exchange response differences between arm and leg exercise, six healthy young men underwent ramp exercise testing at a rate of 15 W.min-1 on a cycle ergometer separately under either spontaneous (SPNT) or fixed (FIX) breathing modes, respectively. Controlled breathing was defined as a breathing frequency (fb; 30 breaths.min-1) which was neither equal to, nor a multiple of, cranking frequency (50 rev.min-1) to prevent coupling of locomotion and respiratory movement, i.e., so-called locomotor-respiratory coupling (LRC). Breath-by-breath oxygen uptake (VO2), ventilation (VE), CO2 output (VCO2), tidal volume (VT), fb and end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) were determined using a computerized metabolic cart. Arm exercise engendered a higher level of VO2 at each work rate than leg exercise under both FIX and SPNT conditions. However, FIX did not notably affect the VO2 response during either arm or leg exercise at each work rate compared to SPNT. During SPNT a significantly higher fb and lower PETCO2 during arm exercise was found compared with leg exercise up to a fb of 30 breaths.min-1 while VE and VT were nearly the same. During fixed breathing when fb was fixed at a higher rate than during SPNT, a significantly lower PETCO2 was observed during both exercise modes. These results suggest that: 1) FIX breathing does not affect the VO2 response during either arm or leg exercise even when non-synchronization between limb locomotion movement and breathing rate was adopted; 2) at a fb of 30 breaths.min-1 FIX breathing induced a hyperventilation resulting in a lower PETCO2 which was not associated with the metabolic rate during either arm or leg exercise, showing that VE during only leg exercise under the FIX condition was significantly higher than under the SPNT condition.
为评估手臂运动和腿部运动之间通气和气体交换反应的差异,六名健康年轻男性分别在自发(SPNT)或固定(FIX)呼吸模式下,以15 W·min⁻¹的速率在自行车测力计上进行递增运动测试。受控呼吸定义为呼吸频率(fb;30次·min⁻¹)既不等于也不是曲柄频率(50转·min⁻¹)的倍数,以防止运动和呼吸运动的耦合,即所谓的运动-呼吸耦合(LRC)。使用计算机化代谢车测定逐次呼吸的摄氧量(VO₂)、通气量(VE)、二氧化碳排出量(VCO₂)、潮气量(VT)、fb和呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO₂)。在FIX和SPNT条件下,手臂运动在每个工作率下产生的VO₂水平均高于腿部运动。然而,与SPNT相比,FIX在每个工作率下对手臂或腿部运动期间的VO₂反应影响不显著。在SPNT期间,与腿部运动相比,手臂运动期间直至fb为30次·min⁻¹时,发现fb显著更高且PETCO₂更低,而VE和VT几乎相同。在固定呼吸时,当fb固定在高于SPNT期间的速率时,在两种运动模式下均观察到PETCO₂显著更低。这些结果表明:1)即使采用肢体运动和呼吸频率不同步,FIX呼吸对手臂或腿部运动期间的VO₂反应也没有影响;2)在fb为30次·min⁻¹时,FIX呼吸引起过度通气,导致PETCO₂降低,这与手臂或腿部运动期间的代谢率无关,表明仅在FIX条件下腿部运动期间的VE显著高于SPNT条件下的VE。