Vautrin Jean, Barker Jeffery L
Laboratory of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Synapse. 2003 Mar;47(3):184-99. doi: 10.1002/syn.10161.
Changes in the amplitudes of signals conveyed at synaptic contacts between neurons underlie many brain functions and pathologies. Here we review the possible determinants of the amplitude and plasticity of the elementary postsynaptic signal, the miniature. In the absence of a definite understanding of the molecular mechanism releasing transmitters, we investigated a possible alternative interpretation. Classically, both the quantal theory and the vesicle theory predict that the amount of transmitter producing a miniature is determined presynaptically prior to release and that rapid changes in miniature amplitude reflect essentially postsynaptic alterations. However, recent data indicates that short-term and long-lasting changes in miniature amplitude are in large part due to changes in the amount of transmitter in individual released packets that show no evidence of preformation. Current representations of transmitter release derive from basic properties of neuromuscular transmission and endocrine secretion. Reexamination of overlooked properties of these two systems indicate that the amplitude of miniatures may depend as much, if not more, on the Ca(2+) signals in the presynaptic terminal than on the number of postsynaptic receptors available or on vesicle's contents. Rapid recycling of transmitter and its possible adsorption at plasma and vesicle lumenal membrane surfaces suggest that exocytosis may reflect membrane traffic rather than actual transmitter release. This led us to reconsider the disregarded hypothesis introduced by Fatt and Katz (1952; J Physiol 117:109-128) that the excitability of the release site may account for the "quantal effect" in fast synaptic transmission. In this case, changes in excitability of release sites would contribute to the presynaptic quantal plasticity that is often recorded.
神经元之间突触连接处传递的信号幅度变化是许多脑功能和病理状态的基础。在此,我们综述了基本突触后信号(微小信号)幅度和可塑性的可能决定因素。在对递质释放的分子机制尚无明确认识的情况下,我们研究了一种可能的替代解释。传统上,量子理论和囊泡理论均预测,产生微小信号的递质数量在释放前由突触前决定,且微小信号幅度的快速变化本质上反映突触后的改变。然而,最近的数据表明,微小信号幅度的短期和长期变化在很大程度上归因于单个释放小泡中递质数量的变化,且没有证据表明存在预先形成的情况。目前关于递质释放的观点源于神经肌肉传递和内分泌分泌的基本特性。对这两个系统被忽视特性的重新审视表明,微小信号的幅度可能同样(如果不是更多的话)取决于突触前终末的Ca(2+)信号,而非取决于可用的突触后受体数量或囊泡内容物。递质的快速循环及其可能在质膜和囊泡腔膜表面的吸附表明,胞吐作用可能反映膜转运而非实际的递质释放。这使我们重新考虑Fatt和Katz(1952年;《生理学杂志》117:109 - 128)提出的被忽视的假说,即释放位点的兴奋性可能解释快速突触传递中的“量子效应”。在这种情况下,释放位点兴奋性的变化将导致经常记录到的突触前量子可塑性。