Hebert James R, Ebbeling Cara B, Matthews Charles E, Hurley Thomas G, MA Yunsheng, Druker Susan, Clemow Lynn
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the Nutrition Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Ann Epidemiol. 2002 Nov;12(8):577-86. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00297-6.
To evaluate energy intake (EI) derived from a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), seven-day dietary recall (7DDR), and seven 24-hour dietary recall interviews (24HR) for reporting errors associated with social desirability and social approval.
The FFQ and 7DDR were administered once before and once after a 14-day metabolic period during which total energy expenditure was determined using the doubly labeled water method (TEE(dlw)). Seven 24HR were conducted over the 14-day period. Data obtained from 80 healthy women (mean age = 49.1 years) were fit to linear regression models in which the EI estimates were the dependent variables and estimates of social desirability and social approval traits, body mass index [weight (kg)/ height (m)(2)], and TEE(dlw) were fit as independent variables.
indicated that in college-educated women there was an underestimate associated with social desirability on the FFQ (-42.24 kcal/day/point on the social desirability scale; 95% CI:-75.48, -9.00). For college-educated women with an average social desirability score ( approximately 17 points) this would equal an underestimate of 507 kcal/day compared to women with the minimum score (4 points). The 7DDR was associated with a differential effect of social approval when comparing by education; i.e., there was a difference of 36.35 kcal/day/point between the two groups (-14.69 in women with >/=college and 21.66 in women with <college) (95% CI: 10.25, 62.45).
Social desirability and social approval distort energy intake estimates from structured questionnaires, in a manner that appears to vary by educational status. Results observed have important implications for subject recruitment, data collection, and for methods of detection and control of biases in epidemiologic studies.
评估通过食物频率问卷(FFQ)、7天饮食回顾(7DDR)和7次24小时饮食回顾访谈(24HR)得出的能量摄入量(EI),以了解与社会期望和社会认可相关的报告误差。
在一个14天的代谢期前后各进行一次FFQ和7DDR,在此期间使用双标水法(TEE(dlw))测定总能量消耗。在这14天内进行7次24HR。从80名健康女性(平均年龄 = 49.1岁)获得的数据被拟合到线性回归模型中,其中EI估计值为因变量,社会期望和社会认可特征、体重指数[体重(千克)/身高(米)²]以及TEE(dlw)的估计值作为自变量。
表明在受过大学教育的女性中,FFQ上与社会期望相关存在低估情况(社会期望量表上每增加1分,每天低估42.24千卡;95%置信区间:-75.48,-9.00)。对于社会期望平均得分(约17分)的受过大学教育的女性,与得分最低(4分)的女性相比,这相当于每天低估507千卡。在按教育程度比较时,7DDR与社会认可的差异效应相关;即两组之间每天每分相差36.35千卡(大学及以上学历女性为-14.69,大学以下学历女性为21.66)(95%置信区间:10.25,62.45)。
社会期望和社会认可会扭曲结构化问卷得出的能量摄入估计值,其方式似乎因教育程度而异。观察到的结果对流行病学研究中的受试者招募、数据收集以及偏差检测和控制方法具有重要意义。