Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison.

OBJECTIVE

To study the long-term recurrence rate and other complications after conventional and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Reliable long-term follow-up of patients with inguinal hernias treated by laparoscopic repair techniques is lacking.

METHODS

The authors performed a randomized, multicenter trial in which 487 patients with inguinal hernia were treated by totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair and 507 patients were treated by conventional anterior hernia repair. Patients were followed and examined for recurrence and chronic inguinal pain 2, 3, and 5 years after surgery. Risk factors for recurrence and chronic inguinal pain were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent conventional repair had a high risk for recurrence compared to patients who underwent laparoscopic repair. Risk factors for recurrence were operative time and type of conventional repair. Predictive independent risk factors for chronic inguinal pain were conventional repair (Bassini repairs and non-bassini repairs), inguinal pain before surgery, and perioperative lesion of the ilioinguinal nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with inguinal hernia who undergo laparoscopic repair have fewer recurrences and less chronic inguinal pain than those who undergo conventional open repair. The Bassini repair produces unacceptably high recurrence rates.