• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统开放性和腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的复发情况:一项随机对照比较研究

Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison.

作者信息

Liem Mike S L, van Duyn Eino B, van der Graaf Yolanda, van Vroonhoven Theo J M V

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):136-41. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00019.

DOI:10.1097/00000658-200301000-00019
PMID:12496541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1513978/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the long-term recurrence rate and other complications after conventional and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Reliable long-term follow-up of patients with inguinal hernias treated by laparoscopic repair techniques is lacking.

METHODS

The authors performed a randomized, multicenter trial in which 487 patients with inguinal hernia were treated by totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair and 507 patients were treated by conventional anterior hernia repair. Patients were followed and examined for recurrence and chronic inguinal pain 2, 3, and 5 years after surgery. Risk factors for recurrence and chronic inguinal pain were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent conventional repair had a high risk for recurrence compared to patients who underwent laparoscopic repair. Risk factors for recurrence were operative time and type of conventional repair. Predictive independent risk factors for chronic inguinal pain were conventional repair (Bassini repairs and non-bassini repairs), inguinal pain before surgery, and perioperative lesion of the ilioinguinal nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with inguinal hernia who undergo laparoscopic repair have fewer recurrences and less chronic inguinal pain than those who undergo conventional open repair. The Bassini repair produces unacceptably high recurrence rates.

摘要

目的

研究传统腹股沟疝修补术和腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的长期复发率及其他并发症。

总结背景资料

缺乏对采用腹腔镜修补技术治疗的腹股沟疝患者进行可靠的长期随访。

方法

作者进行了一项随机多中心试验,其中487例腹股沟疝患者接受完全腹膜外腹腔镜修补术治疗,507例患者接受传统前路疝修补术治疗。术后2年、3年和5年对患者进行随访,检查复发情况和慢性腹股沟疼痛情况。评估复发和慢性腹股沟疼痛的危险因素。

结果

与接受腹腔镜修补术的患者相比,接受传统修补术的患者复发风险较高。复发的危险因素是手术时间和传统修补术的类型。慢性腹股沟疼痛的预测独立危险因素是传统修补术(巴西尼修补术和非巴西尼修补术)、术前腹股沟疼痛以及髂腹股沟神经的围手术期损伤。

结论

与接受传统开放修补术的患者相比,接受腹腔镜修补术的腹股沟疝患者复发较少,慢性腹股沟疼痛也较少。巴西尼修补术的复发率高得令人无法接受。

相似文献

1
Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison.传统开放性和腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的复发情况:一项随机对照比较研究
Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):136-41. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00019.
2
Postoperative hypoesthesia and pain: qualitative assessment after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.术后感觉减退与疼痛:开放及腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的定性评估
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):129-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9388-4. Epub 2007 Aug 19.
3
Tension-free repair versus Bassini technique for strangulated inguinal hernia: A controlled randomized study.无张力修补术与巴西尼技术治疗绞窄性腹股沟疝的对照随机研究
Int J Surg. 2008 Aug;6(4):302-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.04.006. Epub 2008 May 2.
4
Management of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective study of 163 cases.复发性腹股沟疝的治疗:163例前瞻性研究。
Hernia. 2003 Sep;7(3):125-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-003-0130-4. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
5
Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial.腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术后的复发及并发症:一项前瞻性随机多中心试验的结果
Hernia. 2008 Aug;12(4):385-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0357-1. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
6
Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair.传统前路手术与腹腔镜手术治疗腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1997 May 29;336(22):1541-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199705293362201.
7
[Inguinal hernia repair. A randomized multicentric study comparing laparoscopic and open surgical repair].腹股沟疝修补术。一项比较腹腔镜手术修补与开放手术修补的随机多中心研究
J Chir (Paris). 2007 Mar-Apr;144(2):119-24. doi: 10.1016/s0021-7697(07)89483-x.
8
Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3,100 hernia repairs over 15 years.腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术:15年间3100例疝修补术的经验教训
Surg Endosc. 2009 Mar;23(3):482-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0118-3. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
9
Long-term results of a non-ramdomized prospective mono-centre study of 1000 laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repairs.
Acta Chir Belg. 2008 Jul-Aug;108(4):405-8. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2008.11680250.
10
Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial.无张力腹股沟疝修补术:经腹膜前修补术(TEP)与网塞修补术及李金斯坦修补术的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):142-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00020.

引用本文的文献

1
Glue versus tackers for mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中用于补片固定的胶水与钉合器:一项Meta分析和试验序贯分析
Hernia. 2025 Apr 5;29(1):134. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03315-w.
2
The association of permanent versus absorbable fixation on developing chronic post-herniorrhaphy groin pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后永久性与可吸收固定对慢性腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun;38(6):3433-3440. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10866-z. Epub 2024 May 6.
3
Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Comparative Study.腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术:一项对比研究。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 10;15(11):e48619. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48619. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
The mechanisms and management of persistent postsurgical pain.术后持续性疼痛的机制与处理
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 6;4:1154597. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1154597. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparison of Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Internal Ring Closure by Two-Hook Hernia Needle and Open Repair for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia.腹腔镜经皮腹膜外内环缝合术与开放修补术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Aug;33(8):821-828. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0529. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
Comparison of emergent laparoscopic and open repair of acutely incarcerated and strangulated hernias-short- and long-term results.急性嵌顿性和绞窄性疝的急诊腹腔镜修补术与开放修补术的比较——短期和长期结果
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2154-2162. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09743-4. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
7
Robotic re-TAPP: a minimally invasive alternative for the failed posterior repair.机器人再 TAPP:一种用于失败的后修补的微创替代方法。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022 Feb 28;49:e20223063. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223063. eCollection 2022.
8
Outcomes After Laparoscopic Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Repair (TAPP) For Groin Hernia In A Single Consultant Series.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的单中心系列研究结果。
Ulster Med J. 2022 Jan;91(1):4-8. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
9
Modified Halsted's operation for inguinal hernia repair: A new technique.改良哈氏法腹股沟疝修补术:一种新技术。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Oct 19;71:102968. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102968. eCollection 2021 Nov.
10
Surgical outcomes of totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: A retrospective multicenter propensity score-matched study.腹股沟疝完全腹膜外修补术的手术结果:一项回顾性多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Mar 10;5(4):502-509. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12443. eCollection 2021 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study.腹股沟疝修补术后1年的疼痛与功能障碍:一项全国性问卷调查研究
Ann Surg. 2001 Jan;233(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200101000-00001.
2
Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术方法的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价
Br J Surg. 2000 Jul;87(7):860-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01540.x.
3
Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair.腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的前瞻性研究。
Br J Surg. 1999 Dec;86(12):1528-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01320.x.
4
Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study).腹腔镜补片与开放腹膜前补片及传统技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项随机多中心试验(SCUR疝修补术研究)
Ann Surg. 1999 Aug;230(2):225-31. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199908000-00013.
5
Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group.腹腔镜与开放手术修补腹股沟疝:一项随机对照研究。医学研究委员会腹腔镜腹股沟疝试验组
Lancet. 1999 Jul 17;354(9174):185-90.
6
Mesh inguinodynia: a new clinical syndrome after inguinal herniorrhaphy?网片性腹股沟疼痛:腹股沟疝修补术后的一种新临床综合征?
J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Nov;187(5):514-8. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00215-4.
7
A prospective randomized outcome and cost comparison of totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty versus Lichtenstein hernia operation among employed patients.在职患者中完全腹膜外内镜疝修补术与Lichtenstein疝修补术的前瞻性随机结局与成本比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Oct;8(5):338-44.
8
Prospective randomized comparison of the Shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair procedures.Shouldice法与Lichtenstein法疝修补手术的前瞻性随机对照研究
Arch Surg. 1998 Sep;133(9):974-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.9.974.
9
Follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. Questionnaire compared with physical examination: a prospective study in 299 patients.腹股沟疝修补术后的随访。问卷调查与体格检查的比较:299例患者的前瞻性研究
Eur J Surg. 1998 Jul;164(7):533-6. doi: 10.1080/110241598750005903.
10
Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost.腹腔镜与开放网片修补术治疗腹股沟疝的随机对照试验:结果与成本
BMJ. 1998 Jul 11;317(7151):103-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7151.103.