Suppr超能文献

ZyWave像差仪测量的可重复性和有效性

Repeatability and validity of Zywave aberrometer measurements.

作者信息

Hament Willem J, Nabar Vaisjaly A, Nuijts Rudy M M A

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Dec;28(12):2135-41. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01333-0.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To study the repeatability of Zywave aberrometer (Bausch & Lomb) measurements and compare the measurements with those of subjective refraction and noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefractions in a clinical setting.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

METHODS

Subjective manifest refraction, noncycloplegic autorefraction, cycloplegic autorefraction, and Zywave aberrometer measurements were performed in 20 eyes of 20 myopic patients. Three consecutive Zywave measurements were performed with and without dilation of the pupil. The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement among the measurement methods were determined for dilated and 3.5 mm pupils. The repeatability coefficient of the Zywave aberrometer measurements was determined.

RESULTS

The mean differences in spherical equivalent (SE), sphere, and cylinder between subjective refraction and Zywave predicted phoropter refraction (PPR) with a dilated pupil were -1.10 diopters (D) +/- 0.46 (SD) (P <.001), -1.08 +/- 0.44 D (P <.001), and -0.02 +/- 0.37 D (P =.87), respectively (paired Student t test). After the data were converted to a 3.5 mm pupil, the mean differences were -0.55 +/- 0.48 D (P <.001), -0.50 +/- 0.49 D (P <.001), and -0.16 +/- 0.50 D (P =.15), respectively. The mean difference in SE between autorefraction and cycloplegic autorefraction versus subjective refraction was +0.18 +/- 0.71 D (P =.27) and +0.35 +/- 0.62 D (P =.02), respectively. The mean difference in SE between cycloplegic autorefraction and Zywave PPR with a dilated pupil was -1.44 +/- 0.79 D (P <.001). The repeatability coefficient of Zywave PPR was +/-0.25 D for SE, +/-0.29 D for sphere, and +/-0.29 D for cylinder.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective refraction measurements are slightly more myopic than cycloplegic autorefraction measurements. With a dilated pupil, the Zywave measurements were significantly more myopic than subjective refractions and even more myopic than cycloplegic autorefractions. Zywave measurements and subjective refractions were in better agreement with a 3.5 mm pupil. The repeatability of Zywave aberrometer measurements is adequate for lower-order aberrations.

摘要

目的

研究ZyWave像差仪(博士伦公司)测量结果的可重复性,并在临床环境中将这些测量结果与主观验光以及非散瞳和散瞳自动验光的结果进行比较。

设置

荷兰马斯特里赫特大学医院眼科。

方法

对20例近视患者的20只眼进行主观显验光、非散瞳自动验光、散瞳自动验光和ZyWave像差仪测量。在散瞳和瞳孔直径为3.5mm的情况下,分别进行连续3次ZyWave测量。确定了不同测量方法在散瞳和3.5mm瞳孔情况下的平均差异及95%一致性界限。测定了ZyWave像差仪测量结果的重复性系数。

结果

散瞳情况下,主观验光与ZyWave预测的综合验光仪验光(PPR)之间的等效球镜度(SE)、球镜度和柱镜度的平均差异分别为-1.10屈光度(D)±0.46(标准差)(P<.001)、-1.08±0.44D(P<.001)和-0.02±0.37D(P=.87)(配对学生t检验)。将数据转换为瞳孔直径3.5mm后,平均差异分别为-0.55±0.48D(P<.001)、-0.50±0.49D(P<.001)和-0.16±0.50D(P=.15)。自动验光和散瞳自动验光与主观验光之间的SE平均差异分别为+0.18±0.71D(P=.27)和+0.35±0.62D(P=.02)。散瞳情况下,散瞳自动验光与ZyWave PPR之间的SE平均差异为-1.44±0.79D(P<.001)。ZyWave PPR的重复性系数对于SE为±0.25D,对于球镜度为±0.29D,对于柱镜度为±0.29D。

结论

主观验光测量结果比散瞳自动验光测量结果略近视。散瞳情况下,ZyWave测量结果比主观验光明显更近视,甚至比散瞳自动验光更近视。瞳孔直径为3.5mm时,ZyWave测量结果与主观验光结果的一致性更好。ZyWave像差仪测量结果对于低阶像差的可重复性是足够的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验