Bjerner J, Lebedin Y, Bellanger L, Kuroki M, Shively J E, Varaas T, Nustad K, Hammarström S, Børmer O P
Central Laboratory, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tumour Biol. 2002 Jul-Aug;23(4):249-62. doi: 10.1159/000067255.
To characterize antigenic sites in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) further and to investigate whether there are differences between colon tumor CEA and meconium CEA (NCA-2) that can be detected by anti-CEA monoclonal antibodies (MAb), 19 new anti-CEA MAb were analyzed with respect to specificity, epitope reactivity and affinity. Their reactivities were compared with 10 anti-CEA MAb with known CEA-domain binding specificity that have previously been classified into five nonoverlapping epitope groups, GOLD 1-5. Cross-inhibition assays with antigen-coated microtiter plates and immunoradiometric assays were performed in almost all combinations of MAbs, using conventionally purified CEA (domain structure: N-A1B1-A2B2-A3B3-C) from liver metastasis of colorectal carcinomas, recombinant CEA, meconium CEA (NCA-2), truncated forms of CEA and NCA (CEACAM6) as the antigens. The affinity of the MAbs for CEA was also determined. The new MAbs were generally of high affinity and suitable for immunoassays. Three new MAbs were assigned to GOLD epitope group 5 (N-domain binding), 3 MAbs to group 4 (A1B1 domain), 1 to group 3 (A3B3 domain), 3 to group 2 (A2B2 domain) and 3 to group 1 (also the A3B3 domain). Three MAbs formed a separate group related to group 4, they were classified as GOLD 4' (A1B1 domain binding). The remaining 3 MAbs appear to represent new subspecificities with some relationship to GOLD groups 1, 2 or 4, respectively. Five MAbs, all belonging to epitope group 1 and 3, reacted strongly with tumor CEA but only weakly or not at all with meconium CEA, demonstrating that the two products of the CEA gene differ from each other, probably due to different posttranslational modifications.
为进一步明确癌胚抗原(CEA)中的抗原位点,并研究结肠肿瘤CEA与胎粪CEA(NCA-2)之间是否存在可被抗CEA单克隆抗体(MAb)检测到的差异,我们分析了19种新的抗CEA单克隆抗体的特异性、表位反应性和亲和力。将它们的反应性与10种已知CEA结构域结合特异性的抗CEA单克隆抗体进行比较,这10种抗体先前已被分为五个不重叠的表位组,即GOLD 1-5。使用来自结直肠癌肝转移灶的常规纯化CEA(结构域结构:N-A1B1-A2B2-A3B3-C)、重组CEA、胎粪CEA(NCA-2)、CEA和NCA(CEACAM6)的截短形式作为抗原,几乎对所有单克隆抗体组合进行了抗原包被微量滴定板交叉抑制试验和免疫放射分析。还测定了单克隆抗体对CEA的亲和力。新的单克隆抗体一般具有高亲和力,适用于免疫分析。3种新单克隆抗体被归入GOLD表位组5(N结构域结合),3种归入组4(A1B1结构域),1种归入组3(A3B3结构域),3种归入组2(A2B2结构域),3种归入组1(也是A3B3结构域)。3种单克隆抗体形成了一个与组4相关的单独组,它们被分类为GOLD 4'(A1B1结构域结合)。其余3种单克隆抗体似乎分别代表与GOLD组1、2或4有某种关系的新亚特异性。5种单克隆抗体均属于表位组1和3,与肿瘤CEA反应强烈,但与胎粪CEA反应微弱或根本不反应,这表明CEA基因的两种产物彼此不同,可能是由于不同的翻译后修饰。