Suppr超能文献

苯妥英钠或磷苯妥英钠在急诊科常规使用时不良事件及住院时间的随机评估。

Randomized evaluation of adverse events and length-of-stay with routine emergency department use of phenytoin or fosphenytoin.

作者信息

Coplin William M, Rhoney Denise H, Rebuck Jill A, Clements Elizabeth A, Cochran Mary S, O'Neil Brian J

机构信息

Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Wayne State University, 4201 St. Antoine-8D-UHC, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.

出版信息

Neurol Res. 2002 Dec;24(8):842-8. doi: 10.1179/016164102101200834.

Abstract

Intravenous phenytoin has come under increased scrutiny with the introduction of the prodrug, fosphenytoin. We evaluated adverse events and length-of-stay using parenteral the two drugs in routine emergency department use. Open-label randomization of phenytoin or fosphenytoin in 256 Emergency Department patients prescribed 279 parenteral doses of a phenytoin-equivalent. All phenytoin was administered intravenously, and fosphenytoin was given intravenously or intramuscularly (physician preference). Adverse events and Emergency Department length-of-stay were recorded; re-presentation to the Emergency Department within three months was reviewed for evidence of the purple glove syndrome. Nonparametric statistics were used to analyze the data. Seventy-seven patients received phenytoin and 202 fosphenytoin; 28 (10.0%) received intramuscular fosphenytoin. The mean phenytoin-equivalent dose was similar between the groups. Eighteen patients required reduction in infusion rates because of an adverse event (phenytoin = 6.5%, fosphenytoin = 6.4%; OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.4 2.6; p = 1.0). Adverse events occurred with similar frequency (phenytoin 9.1%, fosphenytoin 15.8%; OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3 1.4; p = 0.3). The most common events were: pruritus, pain on infusion, and paresthesias. One patient developed hypotension (fosphenytoin); there were no other serious adverse events, including phlebitis. Median Emergency Department length-of-stay was 6.7 h for phenytoin and 5.7 h for fosphenytoin (p = 0.6). In routine Emergency Department use, our data do not support formulary conversion from phenytoin to fosphenytoin, based on the incidence of adverse events or Emergency Department length-of-stay.

摘要

随着前体药物磷苯妥英的引入,静脉注射苯妥英钠受到了越来越多的审视。我们评估了在急诊科常规使用这两种肠胃外给药药物时的不良事件和住院时间。对256例急诊科患者进行开放标签随机分组,这些患者共接受了279剂苯妥英等效剂量的药物。所有苯妥英钠均通过静脉注射给药,磷苯妥英则通过静脉注射或肌肉注射给药(由医生选择)。记录不良事件和急诊科住院时间;对三个月内再次到急诊科就诊的情况进行审查,以寻找紫手套综合征的证据。使用非参数统计分析数据。77例患者接受了苯妥英钠治疗,202例接受了磷苯妥英治疗;28例(10.0%)接受了肌肉注射磷苯妥英。两组之间的平均苯妥英等效剂量相似。18例患者因不良事件需要降低输注速率(苯妥英钠组 = 6.5%,磷苯妥英组 = 6.4%;比值比0.9,95%置信区间0.4至2.6;p = 1.0)。不良事件发生频率相似(苯妥英钠组9.1%,磷苯妥英组15.8%;比值比0.7,95%置信区间0.3至1.4;p = 0.3)。最常见的事件为:瘙痒、输注时疼痛和感觉异常。1例患者出现低血压(磷苯妥英组);未发生其他严重不良事件,包括静脉炎。苯妥英钠组的急诊科住院时间中位数为6.7小时,磷苯妥英组为5.7小时(p = 0.6)。在急诊科常规使用中,基于不良事件发生率或急诊科住院时间,我们的数据不支持从苯妥英钠转换为磷苯妥英的处方集变更。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验