Nakamura Kensuke, Inokuchi Ryota, Daidoji Hiroaki, Naraba Hiromu, Sonoo Tomohiro, Hashimoto Hideki, Tokunaga Kurato, Hiruma Takahiro, Doi Kent, Morimura Naoto
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Jonantyo, Hitachi, Ibaraki Department of Emergency and General Medicine, JR General Hospital, Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(25):e7206. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007206.
Benzodiazepines are used as first-line treatments for status epilepticus. Fosphenytoin (FPHT) is recommended for second-line therapy; however, intravenous injection of levetiracetam (LEV) may also be effective against status epilepticus. Herein, we compared the efficacy and safety of LEV as a second-line treatment for status epilepticus with FPHT in Japanese patients.Patients with status epilepticus were selected from the database of the Emergency and Critical Care Center of Hitachi General Hospital. The subjects were patients whose status epilepticus was successfully stopped by diazepam, and in whom FPHT or LEV was administered after diazepam. As LEV injections recently became clinically available in Japan, the choice of drug was determined by the treatment period. Thus, 21 patients who were intravenously injected with LEV as a second-line therapy and 42 matched patients (historical controls) who were treated with FPHT (1:2) were selected.The subjects had a mean age of 64.0 ± 2.2 years, and included 48 males and 15 females. The status epilepticus control rates of the FPHT and LEV groups did not differ significantly (81.0% [34/42] vs 85.1% [18/21], respectively; P = .69). As for serious adverse events, a reduction in blood pressure was observed in the FPHT group, but not in the LEV group. The oral anticonvulsant switching rates of the 2 groups were similar, but the same-drug switching rates of the FPHT and LEV groups were 8.1% and 77.8%, respectively.The efficacy of intravenous LEV injections after status epilepticus was equivalent to that of FPHT, and the incidence of adverse events was lower in the LEV group. LEV is effective and safe at preventing recurrent seizures after status epilepticus following benzodiazepine treatment.
苯二氮䓬类药物用作癫痫持续状态的一线治疗药物。磷苯妥英(FPHT)推荐用于二线治疗;然而,静脉注射左乙拉西坦(LEV)对癫痫持续状态也可能有效。在此,我们比较了在日本患者中,LEV作为癫痫持续状态二线治疗药物与FPHT的疗效和安全性。
癫痫持续状态患者选自日立总医院急诊与重症监护中心的数据库。研究对象为癫痫持续状态经地西泮成功终止,且在使用地西泮后给予FPHT或LEV治疗的患者。由于LEV注射剂最近在日本开始临床应用,药物选择取决于治疗时间。因此,选取了21例接受静脉注射LEV作为二线治疗的患者和42例接受FPHT治疗的匹配患者(历史对照)(1:2)。
研究对象的平均年龄为64.0±2.2岁,包括48例男性和15例女性。FPHT组和LEV组的癫痫持续状态控制率无显著差异(分别为81.0%[34/42]和85.1%[18/21];P = 0.69)。至于严重不良事件,FPHT组观察到血压下降,而LEV组未观察到。两组的口服抗惊厥药物转换率相似,但FPHT组和LEV组的同一种药物转换率分别为8.1%和77.8%。
癫痫持续状态后静脉注射LEV的疗效与FPHT相当,且LEV组不良事件发生率较低。LEV在预防苯二氮䓬类药物治疗后癫痫持续状态后的复发癫痫方面有效且安全。