Suppr超能文献

835兆赫兹和1900兆赫兹频段的袖珍式移动电话的比吸收率(SAR)

SARs for pocket-mounted mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz.

作者信息

Kang Gang, Gandhi Om P

机构信息

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, 3280 MEB, 50 S Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2002 Dec 7;47(23):4301-13. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/23/314.

Abstract

Increasingly, mobile telephones are becoming pocket-sized and are being left in the shirt pocket with a connection to the ear for hands-free operation. We have considered an anatomic model of the chest and a planar phantom recommended by US FCC to compare the peak 1 and 10 g SARs for four typical cellular telephones, two each at 835 and 1900 MHz. An agreement within +/- 10% is obtained between calculated and experimental 1 and 10 g SARs for various separations (2-8 mm) from the planar phantom used to represent different thicknesses of the clothing both for the antenna away from or turned back towards the body. Because of the closer placement of the antennas relative to the body, the peak 1 and 10 g SARs are considerably higher (by a factor of 2-7) for pocket-mounted telephones as compared to the SARs obtained using a 6 mm thick plastic ear head model--a procedure presently accepted both in the US and Europe. This implies that a telephone tested for SAR compliance against the model of the head may be severely out of compliance if it were placed in the shirt pocket.

摘要

移动电话越来越小型化,常被放在衬衫口袋里,通过与耳朵相连实现免提操作。我们考虑了胸部的解剖模型以及美国联邦通信委员会推荐的平面人体模型,以比较四款典型手机在835和1900 MHz频段下的1 g和10 g比吸收率峰值。对于用于代表不同厚度衣物的平面人体模型,在距离模型2至8毫米的不同间距下,计算得到的1 g和10 g比吸收率与实验值之间的误差在±10%以内,无论天线是远离身体还是朝向身体。由于天线相对于身体的放置位置更近,与使用6毫米厚塑料耳头模型得到的比吸收率相比,口袋式手机的1 g和10 g比吸收率峰值要高得多(高出2至7倍)——目前美国和欧洲都采用这种方法。这意味着,一款通过头部模型测试比吸收率符合标准的手机,如果放在衬衫口袋里,可能会严重不符合标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验