Suppr超能文献

一项随机临床试验中参与者与非参与者的基线特征及死亡经历比较:医师健康研究。

Comparison of baseline characteristics and mortality experience of participants and nonparticipants in a randomized clinical trial: the Physicians' Health Study.

作者信息

Sesso Howard D, Gaziano J Michael, VanDenburgh Martin, Hennekens Charles H, Glynn Robert J, Buring Julie E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Control Clin Trials. 2002 Dec;23(6):686-702. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00235-0.

Abstract

Although subjects randomized into clinical trials tend to have different mortality experiences from those not randomized, few studies have examined how baseline characteristics may explain these differences. We used the recruitment experience of the Physicians' Health Study (PHS) to describe and compare subgroups of subjects ultimately randomized - or not - into the PHS. A total of 112528 male physicians ages 40-84 years responded to letters of invitation and baseline questionnaires sent to 261248 subjects. Baseline information was collected on eligibility criteria, plus lifestyle and clinical risk factors. Total, cardiovascular, cancer, and other mortality were determined through the National Death Index after a mean follow-up of 5.39 years. Respondents had 19 and 19% lower total and cardiovascular mortality rates than nonrespondents. Similarly, willing respondents were 19 and 16% less likely to die than unwilling respondents. However, much of this difference in mortality was explained by disease and lifestyle factors. Respondents who were eligible for the PHS had significantly lower age-adjusted relative risks (RRs) that were attenuated but remained substantially below 1 upon multivariate adjustment in models for total (RRs from 0.48 to 0.79), cardiovascular (from 0.40 to 0.85), and cancer mortality (from 0.55 to 0.87). Finally, a nearly halving in the age-adjusted risk of total and cause-specific mortality among men completing a run-in and randomized into PHS compared with those not randomized was nominally altered upon adding all covariates into multivariate models. In conclusion, a difference in mortality rates according to willingness to participate in a trial was explained by disease and lifestyle factors. In contrast, diseases and risk factors explain some, but not all, of the lower mortality rates of physicians based on eligibility status and their ability to complete a run-in phase.

摘要

尽管随机分组进入临床试验的受试者与未随机分组的受试者往往有不同的死亡经历,但很少有研究探讨基线特征如何解释这些差异。我们利用医师健康研究(PHS)的招募经历来描述和比较最终被随机分组——或未被随机分组——进入PHS的受试者亚组。共有112528名年龄在40 - 84岁的男性医生回复了发给261248名受试者的邀请信和基线调查问卷。收集了关于入选标准、生活方式和临床风险因素的基线信息。在平均随访5.39年后,通过国家死亡指数确定全因、心血管、癌症和其他原因导致的死亡率。回复者的全因和心血管死亡率比未回复者分别低19%和19%。同样地,愿意参与的回复者比不愿意参与的回复者死亡可能性分别低19%和16%。然而,这种死亡率差异的很大一部分可由疾病和生活方式因素来解释。符合PHS入选标准的回复者在年龄调整后的相对风险(RRs)显著较低,在多变量调整模型中,全因死亡率(RRs从0.48至0.79)、心血管死亡率(从0.40至0.85)和癌症死亡率(从0.55至0.87)虽有所减弱但仍大幅低于1。最后,在多变量模型中加入所有协变量后,与未被随机分组的男性相比,完成预试验并被随机分组进入PHS的男性在年龄调整后的全因和特定病因死亡率风险几乎减半的情况有了名义上的改变。总之,参与试验意愿不同导致的死亡率差异可由疾病和生活方式因素来解释。相比之下,疾病和风险因素解释了基于入选状态和完成预试验阶段能力的医生较低死亡率的部分而非全部原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验