Gama de Abreu Marcelo, Heintz Manuel, Heller Axel, Széchényi Roswitha, Albrecht Detlev Michael, Koch Thea
Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Germany.
Anesth Analg. 2003 Jan;96(1):220-8, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200301000-00045.
We tested the hypothesis that one-lung ventilation (OLV) with high tidal volumes (VT) and zero positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may lead to ventilator-induced lung injury. In an isolated, perfused rabbit lung model, VT and PEEP were set to avoid lung collapse and overdistension in both lungs, resulting in a straight pressure-time (P-vs-t) curve during constant flow. Animals were randomized to (a) nonprotective OLV (left lung) (n = 6), with VT values as high as before randomization and zero PEEP; (b) protective OLV (left lung) (n = 6), with 50% reduction of VT and maintenance of PEEP as before randomization; and (c) control group (n = 6), with ventilation of two lungs as before randomization. The nonprotective OLV was associated with significantly smaller degrees of collapse and overdistension in the ventilated lung (P < 0.001). Peak inspiratory pressure values were higher in the nonprotective OLV group (P < 0.001) and increased progressively throughout the observation period (P < 0.01). The mean pulmonary artery pressure and lung weight gain values, as well as the concentration of thromboxane B(2), were comparatively higher in the nonprotective OLV group (P < 0.05). A ventilatory strategy with VT values as high as those used in the clinical setting and zero PEEP leads to ventilator-induced lung injury in this model of OLV, but this can be minimized with VT and PEEP values set to avoid lung overdistension and collapse.
One-lung ventilation with high tidal volumes and zero positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is injurious in the isolated rabbit lung model. A ventilatory strategy with tidal volumes and PEEP set to avoid lung overdistension and collapse minimizes lung injury during one-lung ventilation in this model.
我们检验了这样一种假设,即大潮气量(VT)和零呼气末正压(PEEP)的单肺通气(OLV)可能导致呼吸机诱导的肺损伤。在一个离体、灌注兔肺模型中,设置VT和PEEP以避免双肺出现肺萎陷和过度扩张,在恒流期间产生一条直线型压力-时间(P-t)曲线。将动物随机分为:(a)非保护性OLV(左肺)(n = 6),VT值高达随机分组前水平且PEEP为零;(b)保护性OLV(左肺)(n = 6),VT降低50%且PEEP维持在随机分组前水平;(c)对照组(n = 6),双肺通气情况同随机分组前。非保护性OLV与通气肺的萎陷和过度扩张程度显著较小相关(P < 0.001)。非保护性OLV组的吸气峰压值更高(P < 0.001),且在整个观察期内逐渐升高(P < 0.01)。非保护性OLV组的平均肺动脉压、肺重量增加值以及血栓素B2浓度相对较高(P < 0.05)。在该OLV模型中,采用临床环境中使用的VT值且PEEP为零的通气策略会导致呼吸机诱导的肺损伤,但通过设置VT和PEEP值以避免肺过度扩张和萎陷可将这种损伤降至最低。
在离体兔肺模型中,大潮气量和零呼气末正压(PEEP)的单肺通气具有损伤性。在该模型中,通过设置潮气量和PEEP以避免肺过度扩张和萎陷的通气策略可使单肺通气期间的肺损伤降至最低。