Dreyfuss D, Saumon G
Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Nov;148(5):1194-203. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.5.1194.
Mechanical ventilation with high peak inspiratory pressure and large tidal volume (VT) produces permeability pulmonary edema. Whether it is mean or peak inspiratory pressure (i.e., mean or end-inspiratory volume) that is the major determinant of ventilation-induced lung injury is unsettled. Rats were ventilated with increasing tidal volumes starting from different degrees of FRC that were set by increasing end-expiratory pressure during positive-pressure ventilation. Pulmonary edema was assessed by the measurement of extravascular lung water content. The importance of permeability alterations was evaluated by measurement of dry lung weight and determination of albumin distribution space. Pulmonary edema with permeability alterations occurred regardless of the value of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), provided the increase in VT was large enough. Similarly, edema occurred even during normal VT ventilation provided the increase in PEEP was large enough. Furthermore, moderate increases in VT or PEEP that were innocuous when applied alone, produced edema when combined. The effect of PEEP was not the consequence of raised airway pressure but of the increase in FRC since similar observations were made in animals ventilated with negative inspiratory pressure. However, although permeability alterations were similar, edema was less marked in animals ventilated with PEEP than in those ventilated with zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) with the same end-inspiratory pressure. This "beneficial" effect of PEEP was probably the consequence of hemodynamic alterations. Indeed, infusion of dopamine to correct the drop in systemic arterial pressure that occurred during PEEP ventilation resulted in a significant increase in pulmonary edema. In conclusion, rather than VT or FRC value, the end-inspiratory volume is probably the main determinant of ventilation-induced edema. Hemodynamic status plays an important role in modulating the amount of edema during lung overinflation but does not fundamentally modify the characteristics of this edema which is consistently associated with major permeability alterations. These results may be relevant for ventilatory strategies during acute respiratory failure.
高峰吸气压力和大潮气量(VT)的机械通气会导致通透性肺水肿。究竟是平均吸气压力还是高峰吸气压力(即平均或吸气末容积)是通气诱导性肺损伤的主要决定因素尚无定论。通过在正压通气期间增加呼气末压力来设定不同程度的功能残气量(FRC),并从该FRC开始用递增的潮气量对大鼠进行通气。通过测量血管外肺含水量来评估肺水肿。通过测量干肺重量和确定白蛋白分布空间来评估通透性改变的重要性。只要潮气量增加足够大,无论呼气末正压(PEEP)值如何,都会发生伴有通透性改变的肺水肿。同样,即使在正常潮气量通气期间,只要呼气末正压增加足够大,也会发生水肿。此外,单独应用时无害的潮气量或呼气末正压的适度增加,联合应用时会产生水肿。呼气末正压的作用不是气道压力升高的结果,而是功能残气量增加的结果,因为在用负压吸气通气的动物中也观察到了类似现象。然而,尽管通透性改变相似,但在相同吸气末压力下,用呼气末正压通气的动物的水肿比用呼气末压力为零(ZEEP)通气的动物轻。呼气末正压的这种“有益”作用可能是血流动力学改变的结果。事实上,输注多巴胺以纠正呼气末正压通气期间发生的体循环动脉压下降,会导致肺水肿显著增加。总之,可能是吸气末容积而非潮气量或功能残气量值,是通气诱导性水肿的主要决定因素。血流动力学状态在调节肺过度膨胀期间的水肿量方面起重要作用,但并未从根本上改变这种水肿的特征,这种水肿始终与主要的通透性改变相关。这些结果可能与急性呼吸衰竭期间的通气策略有关。