Konrad Marianne, Metzler Markus, Panzer Simon, Ostreicher Iris, Peham Martina, Repp Reinald, Haas Oskar A, Gadner Helmut, Panzer-Grumayer E Renate
Children's Cancer Research Institute and St Anna Kinderspital, Vienna, Austria.
Blood. 2003 May 1;101(9):3635-40. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3252. Epub 2002 Dec 27.
TEL/AML1-positive childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALLs) generally have low-risk features, but still about 20% of patients relapse. Our initial molecular genetic analyses in 2 off-treatment relapses suggested that the initial and relapse clones represent different subclones that evolved from a common TEL/AML1-positive, treatment-resistant precursor. In order to further elaborate on this hypothesis, we studied 2 patients with late systemic relapses of their TEL/AML1-positive ALL (41 months and 49 months after initial diagnosis, respectively) who had distinct clonal antigen receptor gene rearrangements at diagnosis and relapse. These clone-specific markers enabled us to determine the responsiveness of the individual clones to treatment. The matching genomic TEL/AML1 breakpoints of the initial and the relapse clones in these patients confirmed their origin from a common progenitor cell. This proof was especially important in one of these 2 leukemias without a common antigen receptor gene rearrangement. Our retrospective analysis revealed that in both cases the relapse clone was already present at diagnosis. Despite their small sizes (5 x 10(-3) and 1 x 10(-4), respectively), we were able to detect their much slower responses to therapy compared with the dominant leukemic clone. Moreover, in all instances, these initially slow-responding clones, after they had developed into the relapse leukemia, were rapidly eradicated by the relapse treatment, underlining their different biology at the 2 time points of leukemia manifestation. We thus hypothesize that the minor clone was not fully malignant at initial diagnosis but acquired further mutations that may be necessary for the manifestation of relapse.
TEL/AML1阳性的儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)通常具有低风险特征,但仍有大约20%的患者会复发。我们对2例停止治疗后复发的患者进行的初步分子遗传学分析表明,初始克隆和复发克隆代表了不同的亚克隆,它们从一个共同的TEL/AML1阳性、耐药前体进化而来。为了进一步阐述这一假设,我们研究了2例TEL/AML1阳性ALL发生晚期全身复发的患者(分别在初始诊断后41个月和49个月),他们在诊断和复发时具有不同的克隆性抗原受体基因重排。这些克隆特异性标志物使我们能够确定各个克隆对治疗的反应性。这2例患者初始克隆和复发克隆匹配的基因组TEL/AML1断点证实它们起源于一个共同的祖细胞。在这2例白血病中的1例没有共同抗原受体基因重排的情况下,这一证据尤为重要。我们的回顾性分析显示,在这2例病例中,复发克隆在诊断时就已存在。尽管它们的大小较小(分别为5×10⁻³和1×10⁻⁴),但我们能够检测到它们对治疗的反应比占主导地位的白血病克隆慢得多。此外,在所有情况下,这些最初反应缓慢的克隆在发展为复发性白血病后,被复发治疗迅速根除,突出了它们在白血病表现的两个时间点具有不同的生物学特性。因此,我们假设在初始诊断时,小克隆并非完全恶性,但获得了进一步的突变,这些突变可能是复发表现所必需的。