• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分类、概念学习与行为分析:导论

Categorization, concept learning, and behavior analysis: an introduction.

作者信息

Zentall Thomas R, Galizio Mark, Critchfied Thomas S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):237-48. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-237.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.2002.78-237
PMID:12507002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1284898/
Abstract

Categorization and concept learning encompass some of the most important aspects of behavior, but historically they have not been central topics in the experimental analysis of behavior. To introduce this special issue of the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (JEAB), we define key terms; distinguish between the study of concepts and the study of concept learning; describe three types of concept learning characterized by the stimulus classes they yield; and briefly identify several other themes (e.g., quantitative modeling and ties to language) that appear in the literature. As the special issue demonstrates, a surprising amount and diversity of work is being conducted that either represents a behavior-analytic perspective or can inform or constructively challenge this perspective.

摘要

分类和概念学习涵盖了行为的一些最重要方面,但从历史上看,它们并不是行为实验分析中的核心主题。为了介绍《行为实验分析杂志》(JEAB)的这一特刊,我们定义了关键术语;区分了概念研究和概念学习研究;描述了由它们产生的刺激类别所表征的三种概念学习类型;并简要指出了文献中出现的其他几个主题(例如,定量建模以及与语言的联系)。正如该特刊所展示的,正在进行数量惊人且种类多样的研究工作,这些研究要么代表了行为分析的视角,要么能够为这一视角提供信息或对其进行建设性的挑战。

相似文献

1
Categorization, concept learning, and behavior analysis: an introduction.分类、概念学习与行为分析:导论
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):237-48. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-237.
2
Categorization of novel stimuli in well-known natural concepts: a case study.知名自然概念中新型刺激的分类:一项案例研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):377-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03196176.
3
The rules versus similarity distinction.规则与相似性的区别。
Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Feb;28(1):1-14; discussion 14-49. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x05000014.
4
Human and animal perceptual learning: some common and some unique features.人类与动物的知觉学习:一些共同特征与一些独特特征。
Learn Behav. 2009 May;37(2):154-60. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.2.154.
5
An enquiry into the process of categorization of pictures and words.对图片和文字分类过程的探究。
Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Feb;96(1):267-87. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.96.1.267.
6
The formation of a generalized categorization repertoire: effect of training with multiple domains, samples, and comparisons.广义分类库的形成:多领域、样本及比较训练的效果
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):291-313. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-291.
7
Categorization behaviour in adults, adolescents, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder adolescents: A comparative investigation.成人、青少年及注意力缺陷多动障碍青少年的分类行为:一项比较研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(6):1058-72. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.974625. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
8
A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).多维刺激分类的比较分析:I. 单维分类不一定意味着分析处理;来自鸽子(家鸽)、松鼠(卡罗来纳松鼠)和人类(智人)的证据。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):391-405. doi: 10.1037/a0016216.
9
The use of perceptual features in categorization by orangutans (Pongo abelli).红毛猩猩(Pongo abelli)在分类中对感知特征的运用。
Anim Cogn. 2008 Oct;11(4):569-85. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0148-1. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
10
Scope of linguistic influence: does a classifier system alter object concepts?语言影响的范围:分类系统会改变物体概念吗?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):485-501. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.485.

引用本文的文献

1
Using must-have and can-have features to improve conceptual learning.利用必备和可选功能来提升概念学习。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2025 Jul;124(1):e70037. doi: 10.1002/jeab.70037.
2
An interview study about how nurses and physicians talk about the same concepts differently.一项关于护士和医生如何用不同的方式谈论相同概念的访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05682-x.
3
The Evolution of the Conceptually Systematic Dimension and Its Current Functions in Applied Behavior Analysis.应用行为分析中概念性系统维度的演变及其当前功能
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Feb 1;47(1):1-27. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00396-3. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Supervised machine learning aided behavior classification in pigeons.监督机器学习辅助鸽子行为分类。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jun;55(4):1624-1640. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01881-w. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
5
Learning of sameness/difference relationships by honey bees: performance, strategies and ecological context.蜜蜂对相同/差异关系的学习:表现、策略与生态背景
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Feb;37:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.008.
6
Strategy Development and Feedback Processing During Complex Category Learning.复杂类别学习中的策略发展与反馈处理
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 10;12:672330. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672330. eCollection 2021.
7
Insect-Inspired Robots: Bridging Biological and Artificial Systems.受昆虫启发的机器人:连接生物与人工系统
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 16;21(22):7609. doi: 10.3390/s21227609.
8
Evaluating the progress of deep learning for visual relational concepts.评估深度学习在视觉关系概念上的进展。
J Vis. 2021 Oct 5;21(11):8. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.11.8.
9
Same or different? Abstract relational concept use in juvenile bamboo sharks and Malawi cichlids.相同还是不同?幼年竹鲨和马拉维丽鱼中抽象关系概念的运用。
Curr Zool. 2018 Jul 14;67(3):279-292. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoy059. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Mouse visual cortex areas represent perceptual and semantic features of learned visual categories.鼠类视觉皮层区域代表了习得视觉类别的知觉和语义特征。
Nat Neurosci. 2021 Oct;24(10):1441-1451. doi: 10.1038/s41593-021-00914-5. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior.论命名和其他符号行为的起源。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185.
2
Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: I. Adults.基线关系的反转和刺激等价性:一、成人。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 May;63(3):225-38. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-225.
3
Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: A theoretical analysis of control by negative stimuli.条件辨别与等价关系:负刺激控制的理论分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):183-204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-183.
4
Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence.非人类尚未表现出刺激等价性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):385-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385.
5
Same/different concept learning in the pigeon: the effect of negative instances and prior adaptation to transfer stimuli.鸽子的相同/不同概念学习:负例的影响和对转移刺激的先前适应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):177-86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-177.
6
STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG THE DIMENSION OF ANGULARITY: A COMPARISON OF TRAINING PROCEDURES.沿角度维度的刺激泛化:训练程序的比较
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Aug;60:59-63. doi: 10.1037/h0022334.
7
COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON.鸽子的复杂视觉概念
Science. 1964 Oct 23;146(3643):549-51. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3643.549.
8
When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer.我们何时何地应用所学知识?一种远迁移的分类法。
Psychol Bull. 2002 Jul;128(4):612-37. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612.
9
Clustering in artificial categories: an equivalence analysis.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Sep;8(3):609-14. doi: 10.3758/bf03196197.
10
Many-to-one and one-to-many associative learning in a naturalistic task.自然任务中的多对一和一对多联想学习
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2001 Sep;7(3):182-94.