• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国初级保健中电子病历的一项提议。

A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care.

作者信息

Bates David W, Ebell Mark, Gotlieb Edward, Zapp John, Mullins H C

机构信息

Center for Applied Medical Information Systems, Partners Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb;10(1):1-10. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1097.

DOI:10.1197/jamia.m1097
PMID:12509352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC150354/
Abstract

Delivery of excellent primary care-central to overall medical care-demands that providers have the necessary information when they give care. This paper, developed by the National Alliance for Primary Care Informatics, a collaborative group sponsored by a number of primary care societies, argues that providers' and patients' information and decision support needs can be satisfied only if primary care providers use electronic medical records (EMRs). Although robust EMRs are now available, only about 5% of U.S. primary care providers use them. Recently, with only modest investments, Australia, New Zealand, and England have achieved major breakthroughs in implementing EMRs in primary care. Substantial benefits realizable through routine use of electronic medical records include improved quality, safety, and efficiency, along with increased ability to conduct education and research. Nevertheless, barriers to adoption exist and must be overcome. Implementing specific policies can accelerate utilization of EMRs in the U.S.

摘要

提供优质的初级保健——这是整体医疗护理的核心——要求医疗服务提供者在提供护理时掌握必要的信息。本文由初级保健信息学全国联盟撰写,该联盟是一个由多个初级保健协会赞助的合作组织,文中指出,只有初级保健提供者使用电子病历(EMR),才能满足医疗服务提供者和患者的信息及决策支持需求。尽管现在已有功能强大的电子病历,但美国只有约5%的初级保健提供者在使用。最近,澳大利亚、新西兰和英国仅投入了少量资金,就在初级保健领域实施电子病历方面取得了重大突破。通过日常使用电子病历可实现的显著益处包括提高质量、安全性和效率,以及增强开展教育和研究的能力。然而,采用电子病历存在障碍,必须加以克服。实施具体政策可以加速美国电子病历的使用。

相似文献

1
A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care.美国初级保健中电子病历的一项提议。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb;10(1):1-10. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1097.
2
Automating quality measurement: a system for scalable, comprehensive, and routine care quality assessment.自动化质量测量:一个用于可扩展、全面且常规的护理质量评估的系统。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:229-33.
3
Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians.门诊医疗中的电子健康记录——一项针对医生的全国性调查。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 3;359(1):50-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0802005. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
4
Characteristics of patient portals developed in the context of health information exchanges: early policy effects of incentives in the meaningful use program in the United States.在健康信息交换背景下开发的患者门户的特征:美国有意义使用计划中激励措施的早期政策效果
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 21;16(11):e258. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3698.
5
Social, ethical and legal barriers to e-health.电子健康的社会、伦理和法律障碍。
Int J Med Inform. 2007 May-Jun;76(5-6):480-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.016. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
6
Adopting electronic medical records: are they just electronic paper records?采用电子病历:它们仅仅是电子化的纸质病历吗?
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Jul;59(7):e322-9.
7
EMRs. What you need to know.电子病历。你需要了解的内容。
Med Econ. 2003 May 9;80(9):TCP5-TCP14.
8
Adoption of electronic health records in primary care pediatric practices.基层医疗儿科实践中电子健康记录的采用情况。
Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):e20-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-3000.
9
An examination of the financial feasibility of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs): a case study of tangible and intangible benefits.电子病历(EMR)的财务可行性研究:一项关于有形和无形收益的案例分析。
Int J Electron Healthc. 2006;2(2):185-200. doi: 10.1504/IJEH.2006.008832.
10

引用本文的文献

1
25 Years of Electronic Health Record Implementation Processes: Scoping Review.电子健康记录实施流程25年:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e60077. doi: 10.2196/60077.
2
Frequency Distribution of Pediatric Primary Care Cases in a Rural Site in The Philippines: A Cross-Sectional Study.菲律宾农村地区儿科初级保健病例的频率分布:一项横断面研究。
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Oct 15;58(18):71-78. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.8551. eCollection 2024.
3
Fast reconstruction of EEG signal compression sensing based on deep learning.基于深度学习的 EEG 信号压缩感知快速重建。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 1;14(1):5087. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55334-9.
4
Personal Health Record (PHR) Experience and Recommendations for a Transformation in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯个人健康记录(PHR)的经验及转型建议
J Pers Med. 2023 Aug 19;13(8):1275. doi: 10.3390/jpm13081275.
5
The impact of the progresses of knowledge and technologies in pediatrics.儿科学知识与技术进步的影响。
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Nov;11(11):1748-1750. doi: 10.21037/tp-2022-04.
6
The Understanding of Medical Informatics among Dental and Medical Students.口腔医学生和医学生对医学信息学的理解。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Oct 5;2022:5141568. doi: 10.1155/2022/5141568. eCollection 2022.
7
Driving digital health transformation in hospitals: a formative qualitative evaluation of the English Global Digital Exemplar programme.推动医院数字化健康转型:英国全球数字典范项目的形成性定性评估。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Dec;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100429.
8
Mind the gap: observation windows to define periods of event ascertainment as a quality control method for longitudinal electronic health record data.注意差距:观察窗口作为纵向电子健康记录数据质量控制方法,用于定义事件确定的时间段。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 May;33:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
9
Evaluating a Web-Based Coaching Program Using Electronic Health Records for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in China: Randomized Controlled Trial.在中国,使用电子健康记录评估针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的基于网络的指导项目:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 21;19(7):e264. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6743.
10
The Electronic Health Record: A Blessing for Patient Safety but a Curse for Medical Education?电子健康记录:对患者安全是福音,但对医学教育却是祸根?
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Jun;9(3):398. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00860.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinician use of a palmtop drug reference guide.临床医生对掌上型药物参考指南的使用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 May-Jun;9(3):223-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1001.
2
A randomized, controlled trial of clinical information shared from another institution.一项关于来自另一机构共享临床信息的随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Jan;39(1):14-23. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.120794.
3
Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review.改善初级保健、门诊和社区环境中糖尿病管理的干预措施:一项系统综述。
Diabetes Care. 2001 Oct;24(10):1821-33. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.10.1821.
4
Bundles: meeting clinical information needs.捆绑包:满足临床信息需求。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2001 Jul;89(3):294-6.
5
The ecology of medical care revisited.再谈医疗保健的生态学。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Jun 28;344(26):2021-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200106283442611.
6
Controlled trial of direct physician order entry: effects on physicians' time utilization in ambulatory primary care internal medicine practices.医生直接下达医嘱的对照试验:对门诊基层内科医疗实践中医务人员时间利用的影响
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Jul-Aug;8(4):361-71. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080361.
7
The United States relies on family physicians unlike any other specialty.与其他专科不同,美国依赖家庭医生。
Am Fam Physician. 2001 May 1;63(9):1669.
8
What can technology do to, and for, family medicine?技术能为家庭医学做些什么,又能带来什么?
Fam Med. 2001 Apr;33(4):311-9.
9
Electronic medical records: the FPM vendor survey.电子病历:全科医学供应商调查
Fam Pract Manag. 2001 Jan;8(1):45-54.
10
Physician income trends vary by specialty.医生的收入趋势因专业而异。
Manag Care. 2001 Mar;10(3):17.