Lee R P
Inquiry. 1975 Jun;12(2 SUPPL):51-62.
A characteristic of modernizing societies is the coexistence of modern and traditional professions that claim to perform the same functions for the society. As a result of differential support by the dominant classes and their social values, and by the academic and the political authorities, the modern profession occupies a higher stratificational ranking than the traditional profession. In order to struggle for survival and to compete for more social-political and economic resources, the traditional profession advocates a rational revival, i.e. a rationalization of its social organization and technical contentmin this paper, I have illustrated these generalized statements by analyzing and comparing the profession of modern medicine with that of Chinese medicine in the modernizing society of Hong Kong, These two types of professional services are coexisting in the pluralistic health context of Hong Kong, but the former enjoys greater power, higher prestige and more economic resources. The state of modern medical dominance may be due to its connection with the dominant social value of science and to its support by the "higher" classes and the university and the government in Hong Kong. In recent years; however, there has emerged a revivalistic movement in the realm of Chinese medical care. In significant part, this may be influenced by developments in the People's Republic of China.
现代化社会的一个特点是现代职业与传统职业并存,二者都宣称能为社会履行相同职能。由于统治阶级及其社会价值观、学术和政治当局的支持存在差异,现代职业在社会分层中的地位高于传统职业。为了生存并争夺更多社会政治和经济资源,传统职业倡导理性复兴,即对其社会组织和技术内容进行合理化。在本文中,我通过分析和比较香港这个现代化社会中现代医学职业与中医职业,来说明这些一般性观点。这两种专业服务在香港多元的医疗环境中共存,但前者拥有更大的权力、更高的威望和更多的经济资源。现代医学占据主导地位的状况可能归因于它与科学这一主导社会价值观的联系,以及香港“上层”阶级、大学和政府对它的支持。然而近年来,中医领域出现了一场复兴运动。这在很大程度上可能受到中华人民共和国发展情况的影响。